All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Jason Baron <jbaron@akamai.com>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
	David Laight <David.Laight@ACULAB.COM>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/3] Static calls
Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2018 15:24:05 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20181108212405.4xovfqjqz7x4lgms@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1541711457.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com>

On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 03:15:50PM -0600, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> - Does this feature have much value without retpolines?  If not, should
>   we make it depend on retpolines somehow?

I forgot Andy mentioned that we might be able to use this to clean up
paravirt patching, in which case it would have a lot of value,
retpolines or not...

-- 
Josh

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-11-08 21:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 57+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-11-08 21:15 [PATCH RFC 0/3] Static calls Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-08 21:15 ` [RFC PATCH 1/3] static_call: Add static call infrastructure Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09  9:51   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 14:55     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09 13:39   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 15:10     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09 15:14       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 17:25         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 17:31           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09 17:33             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 17:46               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09 17:52                 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 17:53                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 19:03                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09 19:12                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 17:33             ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09 18:33   ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-09 19:35     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09 19:57       ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-09 20:34         ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-10  5:10           ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-10 11:58             ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-10 13:09               ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-12  3:07                 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-12  4:39                   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-12  4:56                     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-12  5:02                       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-10 11:56           ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-08 21:15 ` [RFC PATCH 2/3] x86/static_call: Add x86 unoptimized static call implementation Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-08 21:15 ` [RFC PATCH 3/3] x86/static_call: Add optimized static call implementation for 64-bit Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-08 21:24 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2018-11-09  7:28 ` [PATCH RFC 0/3] Static calls Ingo Molnar
2018-11-09  7:50   ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-09 13:50   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-09 15:20     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-10 23:20     ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-11 13:42       ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-11 14:25         ` Peter Zijlstra
2018-11-09 14:45   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-12  5:02     ` Ingo Molnar
2018-11-12  5:30       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-12  9:39         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2018-11-12 22:52           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-12 17:03         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-12 22:56           ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-12  5:34       ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-09 15:16   ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-09 15:21     ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09 16:41       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09 18:42         ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-09 19:05           ` Andy Lutomirski
2018-11-09 19:37             ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-09 19:44               ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-09 19:59                 ` Steven Rostedt
2018-11-09 20:36                   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2018-11-10 15:13             ` Masami Hiramatsu
2018-11-09 20:53     ` Rasmus Villemoes

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20181108212405.4xovfqjqz7x4lgms@treble \
    --to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=David.Laight@ACULAB.COM \
    --cc=ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=jbaron@akamai.com \
    --cc=jkosina@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luto@kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.