From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBBC6C43441 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B439F20827 for ; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:16:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="0HG9J/Ya" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B439F20827 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728361AbeKIU4P (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:56:15 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39978 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727532AbeKIU4P (ORCPT ); Fri, 9 Nov 2018 15:56:15 -0500 Received: from localhost (71-6-98-120.static-ip.telepacific.net [71.6.98.120]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3296D20827; Fri, 9 Nov 2018 11:16:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1541762165; bh=UqAi6IvdpTAxbpp+GwLrPqvOm++9VvFLh1BDJNAvcR4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=0HG9J/YaC0SyVFckei/oV0UcNvwsRQ8L6JHxbFTYrw5QjngZIwF1nUY4hSlbMr/2x CypUK0hjfySpQSwG+6Ck+Db8ct2gC6b0j/kmDxxhAngnsD+zk5dqVvGOrQ5nkBnmyt wl/Jtt0A/iPRn91yPLSBK/xhk0PulLlvROtNTSZM= Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 03:16:04 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Bartosz Golaszewski , Adrian Bunk Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , stable , "Chiang, AlanX" , "Yeh, Andy" , sashal@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.14 01/31] eeprom: at24: Add support for address-width property Message-ID: <20181109111604.GB26335@kroah.com> References: <20181108215129.641434673@linuxfoundation.org> <20181108215129.753982396@linuxfoundation.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:48:32AM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > czw., 8 lis 2018 o 23:08 Greg Kroah-Hartman > napisał(a): > > > > 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > Hi Greg, > > this looks like a new feature, not a fix. Are you sure this should go > into the stable branch? Adrian Bunk asked for it to be included as he said it was a good "quirk" support for some hardware enablement issues. If you think it should be dropped, I'll be glad to do so, but it seems harmless to me. thanks, greg k-h