From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45149) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gL4zB-0006Al-Ce for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 06:30:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gL4z6-0005xy-AE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 06:30:01 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:39942) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gL4z6-0005uE-2W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 09 Nov 2018 06:29:56 -0500 Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2018 12:29:53 +0100 From: Gerd Hoffmann Message-ID: <20181109112953.w4wtltwxpl4z2lpj@sirius.home.kraxel.org> References: <20181109111731.vxdmqmkorblcnntx@sirius.home.kraxel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181109111731.vxdmqmkorblcnntx@sirius.home.kraxel.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] List of files containing devices which have not been QOMified List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: QEMU Developers On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 12:17:31PM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > I am also suspicious about hw/bt/ but don't know enough > > about that subsystem to say if it could benefit from > > using QOM objects more. > > I'm wondering whenever anyone would even notice if we just rm -rf hw/bt > > Looking through the changelog for the last five years (after hw/ split) > the only thing I see is fixing warnings from compiler or coverity, > adapting to changes in other systems (chardev for example) and treewide > changes. Not a *single* patch specific to bluetooth ... Tried this after studying docs: qemu -usb -device usb-bt-dongle -bt hci,vlan=0 -bt device:keyboard Segfaults right anway on first keypress. I guess that qualifies as "broken and obviously unused". cheers, Gerd