From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE107C43610 for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 966ED223AE for ; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="k2AA6yDO" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 966ED223AE Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388415AbeKLIUJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:20:09 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43738 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729899AbeKLIUH (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Nov 2018 03:20:07 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [206.108.79.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 95BF02250E; Sun, 11 Nov 2018 22:30:10 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1541975410; bh=pNaIiJLkw/YTn6giYRHv3jtDC0zzL+Kf0tGk18dPTvE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=k2AA6yDO3wwSMU7qnQCX8AHv2RBvNrxPgD+TaFT0duGU5wzLIKXptsMh9M5Le/EwH yS55aTK6YtC+wCiPZ45m2SAk9wb2qn3HO+2GstxUvED7tWBGmW4hjqoMnHZVr2VsZl QNd4/xo+kHLJ5ZhBFYZYBebKlY3qrOPk8sv0ds/k= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson , Stephen Boyd , Bjorn Andersson , Linus Walleij , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.18 120/350] pinctrl: spmi-mpp: Fix pmic_mpp_config_get() to be compliant Date: Sun, 11 Nov 2018 14:19:44 -0800 Message-Id: <20181111221712.180440627@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20181111221707.043394111@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181111221707.043394111@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Douglas Anderson [ Upstream commit 0d5b476f8f57fcb06c45fe27681ac47254f63fd2 ] If you look at "pinconf-groups" in debugfs for ssbi-mpp you'll notice it looks like nonsense. The problem is fairly well described in commit 1cf86bc21257 ("pinctrl: qcom: spmi-gpio: Fix pmic_gpio_config_get() to be compliant") and commit 05e0c828955c ("pinctrl: msm: Fix msm_config_group_get() to be compliant"), but it was pointed out that ssbi-mpp has the same problem. Let's fix it there too. NOTE: in case it's helpful to someone reading this, the way to tell whether to do the -EINVAL or not is to look at the PCONFDUMP for a given attribute. If the last element (has_arg) is false then you need to do the -EINVAL trick. ALSO NOTE: it seems unlikely that the values returned when we try to get PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP will actually be printed since "has_arg" is false for that one, but I guess it's still fine to return different values so I kept doing that. It seems like another driver (ssbi-gpio) uses a custom attribute (PM8XXX_QCOM_PULL_UP_STRENGTH) for something similar so maybe a future change should do that here too. Fixes: cfb24f6ebd38 ("pinctrl: Qualcomm SPMI PMIC MPP pin controller driver") Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd Reviewed-by: Bjorn Andersson Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-mpp.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-mpp.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/qcom/pinctrl-spmi-mpp.c @@ -345,13 +345,12 @@ static int pmic_mpp_config_get(struct pi switch (param) { case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_DISABLE: - arg = pad->pullup == PMIC_MPP_PULL_UP_OPEN; + if (pad->pullup != PMIC_MPP_PULL_UP_OPEN) + return -EINVAL; + arg = 1; break; case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_PULL_UP: switch (pad->pullup) { - case PMIC_MPP_PULL_UP_OPEN: - arg = 0; - break; case PMIC_MPP_PULL_UP_0P6KOHM: arg = 600; break; @@ -366,13 +365,17 @@ static int pmic_mpp_config_get(struct pi } break; case PIN_CONFIG_BIAS_HIGH_IMPEDANCE: - arg = !pad->is_enabled; + if (pad->is_enabled) + return -EINVAL; + arg = 1; break; case PIN_CONFIG_POWER_SOURCE: arg = pad->power_source; break; case PIN_CONFIG_INPUT_ENABLE: - arg = pad->input_enabled; + if (!pad->input_enabled) + return -EINVAL; + arg = 1; break; case PIN_CONFIG_OUTPUT: arg = pad->out_value; @@ -384,7 +387,9 @@ static int pmic_mpp_config_get(struct pi arg = pad->amux_input; break; case PMIC_MPP_CONF_PAIRED: - arg = pad->paired; + if (!pad->paired) + return -EINVAL; + arg = 1; break; case PIN_CONFIG_DRIVE_STRENGTH: arg = pad->drive_strength;