From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail.linutronix.de (146.0.238.70:993) by crypto-ml.lab.linutronix.de with IMAP4-SSL for ; 13 Nov 2018 01:37:27 -0000 Received: from mga18.intel.com ([134.134.136.126]) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1gMNdt-0000ap-39 for speck@linutronix.de; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 02:37:26 +0100 Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2018 17:37:22 -0800 From: Andi Kleen Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH 4/4] RFC-MDSv1 2 Message-ID: <20181113013722.GJ6218@tassilo.jf.intel.com> References: <9a6526b956cc03b5e2d729eb3aae996a5e619d19.1541993526.git.ak@linux.intel.com> <20181112223605.GA9741@kroah.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20181112223605.GA9741@kroah.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: speck@linutronix.de List-ID: On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 02:36:05PM -0800, speck for Greg KH wrote: > On Sun, Nov 11, 2018 at 07:41:04PM -0800, speck for Andi Kleen wrote: > > From: Andi Kleen > > Subject: x86/speculation/mds: Add sysfs reporting > > > > Report mds mitigation state in sysfs vulnerabilities. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen > > --- > > arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ > > drivers/base/cpu.c | 8 ++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+) > > No Documentation/ABI/ update as well? Ok. > > And your subject lines are odd, what order are these to be applied in, > the [PATCH N/4] order of the "v1 N" order at the end of the line? I'm not sure where the v1 N came from, must be from Thomas' speck script? The intended order in [PATCH N/x]. -Andi