From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BE5C18DF5 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D25A22513 for ; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:50:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="JoUTYRVE" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 6D25A22513 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730920AbeKMPqW (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:46:22 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:59920 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730813AbeKMPqV (ORCPT ); Tue, 13 Nov 2018 10:46:21 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (unknown [64.114.255.114]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 14D9022510; Tue, 13 Nov 2018 05:49:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1542088194; bh=YVEvl6hki7F34vqK7BWBKlzJlSaO7EmXHzKS/ds807U=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=JoUTYRVE9piG5sKM6gnA93zzQB8AQtPFmUPf5mBpAlX0VPQ7QgmSchTpMU2JlWRYq he+UcSwkWTJ16AkmioFa4scId4SrFvFBziHd3ZC8Dk0JPLEC4rxPkULxQDb0RZYwX9 enPz6zRr5sYVH05IjQnRcdiEZqS7+s7fIRrs0DuE= From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Daniel Borkmann , Edward Cree , Alexei Starovoitov , Sasha Levin , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 07/44] bpf: fix partial copy of map_ptr when dst is scalar Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 00:49:13 -0500 Message-Id: <20181113054950.77898-7-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20181113054950.77898-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20181113054950.77898-1-sashal@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Daniel Borkmann [ Upstream commit 0962590e553331db2cc0aef2dc35c57f6300dbbe ] ALU operations on pointers such as scalar_reg += map_value_ptr are handled in adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(). Problem is however that map_ptr and range in the register state share a union, so transferring state through dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range is just buggy as any new map_ptr in the dst_reg is then truncated (or null) for subsequent checks. Fix this by adding a raw member and use it for copying state over to dst_reg. Fixes: f1174f77b50c ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Cc: Edward Cree Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Alexei Starovoitov Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- include/linux/bpf_verifier.h | 3 +++ kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 10 ++++++---- 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h index 38b04f559ad3..1fd6fa822d2c 100644 --- a/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h +++ b/include/linux/bpf_verifier.h @@ -50,6 +50,9 @@ struct bpf_reg_state { * PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL */ struct bpf_map *map_ptr; + + /* Max size from any of the above. */ + unsigned long raw; }; /* Fixed part of pointer offset, pointer types only */ s32 off; diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c index 465952a8e465..b046564cc18d 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c @@ -2762,7 +2762,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, dst_reg->umax_value = umax_ptr; dst_reg->var_off = ptr_reg->var_off; dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off + smin_val; - dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range; + dst_reg->raw = ptr_reg->raw; break; } /* A new variable offset is created. Note that off_reg->off @@ -2792,10 +2792,11 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } dst_reg->var_off = tnum_add(ptr_reg->var_off, off_reg->var_off); dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off; + dst_reg->raw = ptr_reg->raw; if (reg_is_pkt_pointer(ptr_reg)) { dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen; /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */ - dst_reg->range = 0; + dst_reg->raw = 0; } break; case BPF_SUB: @@ -2824,7 +2825,7 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, dst_reg->var_off = ptr_reg->var_off; dst_reg->id = ptr_reg->id; dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off - smin_val; - dst_reg->range = ptr_reg->range; + dst_reg->raw = ptr_reg->raw; break; } /* A new variable offset is created. If the subtrahend is known @@ -2850,11 +2851,12 @@ static int adjust_ptr_min_max_vals(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, } dst_reg->var_off = tnum_sub(ptr_reg->var_off, off_reg->var_off); dst_reg->off = ptr_reg->off; + dst_reg->raw = ptr_reg->raw; if (reg_is_pkt_pointer(ptr_reg)) { dst_reg->id = ++env->id_gen; /* something was added to pkt_ptr, set range to zero */ if (smin_val < 0) - dst_reg->range = 0; + dst_reg->raw = 0; } break; case BPF_AND: -- 2.17.1