From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Boris Brezillon Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:54:59 +0100 Subject: [U-Boot] [ANN] U-Boot v2018.11 delayed a day In-Reply-To: <08bc9e78-1b67-1100-db62-dac7d6a89802@gmail.com> References: <20181112214016.GS11247@bill-the-cat> <8668e5b6-00a7-0ebb-8910-b9dd8dabf81b@gmail.com> <20181112222515.GU11247@bill-the-cat> <64cad1b6-99d6-f692-4b9f-aced8fd86fb5@gmail.com> <20181113011247.GV11247@bill-the-cat> <1f09ec2c-d2e6-0e83-541b-5e43fc736f41@gmail.com> <20181113113326.1a328b0b@xps13> <08bc9e78-1b67-1100-db62-dac7d6a89802@gmail.com> Message-ID: <20181113115459.5dce801c@bbrezillon> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 11:41:48 +0100 Marek Vasut wrote: > On 11/13/2018 11:33 AM, Miquel Raynal wrote: > > Hi Marek, > > > > +Jagan > > > > Marek Vasut wrote on Tue, 13 Nov 2018 03:12:49 > > +0100: > > > >> On 11/13/2018 02:12 AM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>> On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 01:03:41AM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>>> On 11/12/2018 11:25 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>>>> On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 11:13:29PM +0100, Marek Vasut wrote: > >>>>>> On 11/12/2018 10:40 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >>>>>>> Hey all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Since Jagan promise a v2 SPI PR for some build fixes that we should have > >>>>>>> in the release and I believe didn't get them out before the end of his > >>>>>>> day, I'm letting everyone know now to expect the release tomorrow > >>>>>>> instead, thanks! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Will anyone have any chance to test those fixes to verify they didn't > >>>>>> break anything ? > >>>>> > >>>>> Since they're obvious enough by inspection, I'm not worried about it. > >>>> > >>>> Which patches are those ? > >>> > >>> The ones in question? > >> > >> Yes, is there a list ? > > > > I think this is the branch: > > https://github.com/openedev/u-boot-amarula/commits/v2-WIP5 > > Ugh, patchwork links would be nice. See here [1]. > > But for example > https://github.com/openedev/u-boot-amarula/commit/91d8f9979420827942ca1f336df36504bd2c1943 > > is quite inobvious, and I think buggy ... > > else if (env_get_f("mtdparts", tmp_parts, sizeof(tmp_parts) != -1)) > > sizeof(tmp_parts) != -1 will always be true. Indeed, I misplaced the closing parens, should be else if (env_get_f("mtdparts", tmp_parts, sizeof(tmp_parts)) != -1) [1]http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=75389