From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-path: Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2018 17:57:58 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= Subject: Re: [PATCH] PWM: drop legacy wrapper for changing polarity Message-ID: <20181120165758.pwprvrhzpftkghap@pengutronix.de> References: <20181015082152.5900-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20181104211945.ychhco6vrmuf6jtc@pengutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20181104211945.ychhco6vrmuf6jtc@pengutronix.de> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: kernel-bounces@pengutronix.de Sender: "kernel" To: Thierry Reding Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Gavin Schenk , =?utf-8?B?Vm9rw6HEjQ==?= Michal , kernel@pengutronix.de List-ID: On Sun, Nov 04, 2018 at 10:19:45PM +0100, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > Hello Thierry, >=20 > On Mon, Oct 15, 2018 at 10:21:52AM +0200, Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig wrote: > > The API to configure a PWM using pwm_enable(), pwm_disable(), > > pwm_config() and pwm_set_polarity() is superseeded by atomically setting > > the parameters using pwm_apply_state(). To get forward with deprecating > > the former set of functions use the opportunity that there is no current > > user of pwm_set_polarity() and remove it. > >=20 > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig >=20 > I think this patch is undisputed and wonder if it fell through the > cracks given that a patch sent later made it into your pwm/for-4.20-rc1 > pull request. Now that you pushed out my lpc patch to your for-next branch (thanks!), I wonder what you plan to do with this patch. Best regards Uwe --=20 Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-K=F6nig | Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |