From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from orcrist.hmeau.com ([104.223.48.154]:48308 "EHLO deadmen.hmeau.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726149AbeKUQe1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:34:27 -0500 Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:01:03 +0800 From: Herbert Xu To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" Cc: Eric Biggers , Ard Biesheuvel , Linux Crypto Mailing List , linux-fscrypt@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, LKML , Paul Crowley , Greg Kaiser , Samuel Neves , Tomer Ashur , Martin Willi Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Exporting existing crypto API code through zinc Message-ID: <20181121060103.4s2byjn2fh2mglno@gondor.apana.org.au> References: <20181105232526.173947-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20181105232526.173947-11-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20181112185816.GA8663@gmail.com> <20181116060227.hwu4igi6bp26ddpi@gondor.apana.org.au> <20181117001718.GA175522@gmail.com> <20181119052451.qttzfgcm4hvbdc4u@gondor.apana.org.au> <20181120060217.t4nccaqpwnxkl4tx@gondor.apana.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-crypto-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:18:24PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > N'ack. As I mentioned in the last email, this really isn't okay, and > mostly defeats the purpose of Zinc in the first place, adding > complexity in a discombobulated half-baked way. Your proposal seems to > be the worst of all worlds. Having talked to lots of people about the > design of Zinc at this point to very positive reception, I'm going to > move forward with submitting v9, once I rebase with the required > changes for Eric's latest merge. Do you have any actual technical reasons for rejecting this apart from your apparent hatred of the existing crypto API? Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: herbert@gondor.apana.org.au (Herbert Xu) Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 14:01:03 +0800 Subject: [RFC PATCH v2 0/4] Exporting existing crypto API code through zinc In-Reply-To: References: <20181105232526.173947-1-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20181105232526.173947-11-ebiggers@kernel.org> <20181112185816.GA8663@gmail.com> <20181116060227.hwu4igi6bp26ddpi@gondor.apana.org.au> <20181117001718.GA175522@gmail.com> <20181119052451.qttzfgcm4hvbdc4u@gondor.apana.org.au> <20181120060217.t4nccaqpwnxkl4tx@gondor.apana.org.au> Message-ID: <20181121060103.4s2byjn2fh2mglno@gondor.apana.org.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 05:18:24PM +0100, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > N'ack. As I mentioned in the last email, this really isn't okay, and > mostly defeats the purpose of Zinc in the first place, adding > complexity in a discombobulated half-baked way. Your proposal seems to > be the worst of all worlds. Having talked to lots of people about the > design of Zinc at this point to very positive reception, I'm going to > move forward with submitting v9, once I rebase with the required > changes for Eric's latest merge. Do you have any actual technical reasons for rejecting this apart from your apparent hatred of the existing crypto API? Cheers, -- Email: Herbert Xu Home Page: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/ PGP Key: http://gondor.apana.org.au/~herbert/pubkey.txt