From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F21A7C43441 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 20:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B23D720824 for ; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 20:00:16 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="ihdrkh53" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org B23D720824 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732159AbeKXGp6 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Nov 2018 01:45:58 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:43512 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729224AbeKXGp5 (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 Nov 2018 01:45:57 -0500 Received: from localhost (unknown [37.142.5.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A292120685; Fri, 23 Nov 2018 20:00:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1543003215; bh=8kFuR1xOVf4eq01hQGad9loy8KNQH2qbCLwRVUJh0A8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=ihdrkh53pQZg8CbZfZhZEyNkSnCiI+XRgh8cxDB5bJfn4c7DrAdg4zYc9yntL2Vi4 vHkBc3ybEXnFy7MkZLLEClm5a1MBu2sKmTYmpNVkz7tMyrmCOWtyJQVWnSg41HhWaP zYQkIFUPGdrY4z2exkNP2a8QTeGzlgAL3BFuLQxU= Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2018 15:00:11 -0500 From: Sasha Levin To: Steven Rostedt Cc: Helge Deller , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Linus Torvalds , "James E.J. Bottomley" , linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org, stable@kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [for-next][PATCH 08/18] parisc: function_graph: Simplify with function_graph_entry() Message-ID: <20181123200011.GM1917@sasha-vm> References: <20181122003332.500796758@goodmis.org> <20181123073033.2083020863@mail.kernel.org> <511cb47a-a1bd-bb5d-69ec-0836c6b5abfe@gmx.de> <20181123121253.278146b4@vmware.local.home> <20181123183415.GB1917@sasha-vm> <20181123142617.3d3972ca@vmware.local.home> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181123142617.3d3972ca@vmware.local.home> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-parisc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-parisc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 02:26:17PM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote: >On Fri, 23 Nov 2018 13:34:15 -0500 >Sasha Levin wrote: > >> Does this mean that someone (Steve) will send a backport of this to all >> relevant stable trees? Right now it looks like the series will randomly >> apply on a mix of trees, which can't be good. > >Nope. I stated that in my 0 patch. That's not good though, if you don't intend for them to be automagically backported to stable trees by Greg, then they shouldn't be tagged at all and if someone is interested then he can provide a backport. What will happen with these is that once Greg's scripts process Linus's tree he'll end up with this patch series inconsistently backported to stable trees, which is not what you want here. Sure, we can wait for the "added to the xyz stable tree" mails and object then, but why risk breaking the trees? -- Thanks. Sasha