From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sk_buff: add skb extension infrastructure
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 13:27:18 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <20181126.132718.445353687376693814.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <20181126113857.29270-1-fw@strlen.de>
        <20181126.124114.1938501276935155970.davem@davemloft.net>
        <20181126211933.kw6wzb63sgjmg634@breakpoint.cc>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: fw@strlen.de
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:44168 "EHLO
        shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
        with ESMTP id S1726363AbeK0IWq (ORCPT
        <rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 03:22:46 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20181126211933.kw6wzb63sgjmg634@breakpoint.cc>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 22:19:33 +0100

>> In the future please document what is so enormous and absolutely
>> required that they must put it all into the SKB control block.
> 
> Ok, will do.

Why don't we establish the details about what MP-TCP needs in the CB
before we discuss this further.

Could you do that for us?

I'm open minded about your approach still, now that I've taken the
xfrm array and nf_bridge aspects into consideration.  So please keep
pursuing this.

Thanks Florian.