From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 11:33:32 -0800 From: Tony Lindgren Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/17] soc: ti: pruss: Add a PRUSS irqchip driver for PRUSS interrupts Message-ID: <20181126193332.GO53235@atomide.com> References: <1542886753-17625-1-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <1542886753-17625-9-git-send-email-rogerq@ti.com> <20181123163742.GC53235@atomide.com> <5BFBAA24.1070503@ti.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5BFBAA24.1070503@ti.com> To: Roger Quadros Cc: robh+dt@kernel.org, bcousson@baylibre.com, ssantosh@kernel.org, ohad@wizery.com, bjorn.andersson@linaro.org, s-anna@ti.com, nsekhar@ti.com, t-kristo@ti.com, nsaulnier@ti.com, jreeder@ti.com, m-karicheri2@ti.com, woods.technical@gmail.com, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Roger Quadros [181126 08:09]: > Tony, > > On 23/11/18 18:37, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > * Roger Quadros [181122 11:39]: > >> The PRUSS INTC module is reference counted during the interrupt > >> setup phase through the irqchip's irq_request_resources() and > >> irq_release_resources() ops. This restricts the module from being > >> removed as long as there are active interrupt users. > > > > So are there any reasons why this could not be just a regular > > drivers/irqchip driver nowadays? > > This is a reqular irqchip driver. Do you mean it should be moved > to drivers/irqchip directory? I think so, is there something preventing doing it? Also, is this maybe the same INTC that we already have a driver for in drivers/irqchip/irq-omap-intc.c? Regards, Tony