From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Florian Westphal Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] sk_buff: add skb extension infrastructure Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 22:41:53 +0100 Message-ID: <20181126214153.jwcdqqvgfpwkb3vx@breakpoint.cc> References: <20181126113857.29270-1-fw@strlen.de> <20181126.124114.1938501276935155970.davem@davemloft.net> <20181126211933.kw6wzb63sgjmg634@breakpoint.cc> <20181126.132718.445353687376693814.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: fw@strlen.de, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc ([146.0.238.67]:49022 "EHLO Chamillionaire.breakpoint.cc" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726315AbeK0IhZ (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Nov 2018 03:37:25 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181126.132718.445353687376693814.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: David Miller wrote: > From: Florian Westphal > Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2018 22:19:33 +0100 > > >> In the future please document what is so enormous and absolutely > >> required that they must put it all into the SKB control block. > > > > Ok, will do. > > Why don't we establish the details about what MP-TCP needs in the CB > before we discuss this further. > > Could you do that for us? Sure. There is also an MPTCP conf call this week and I'll present this patchset there as well. I'll post the requirements and what possible alternatives have been considered here as a follow-up. Thanks, Florian