From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FB27C43610 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 05:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33EC420834 for ; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 05:56:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="AmwfTLGi" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 33EC420834 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728075AbeK2RAk (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:00:40 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:33924 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727024AbeK2RAk (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Nov 2018 12:00:40 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (unknown [37.142.5.207]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AE2C020834; Thu, 29 Nov 2018 05:56:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1543470989; bh=jY7+2yB08jE8HxtxUtg+NxWiQ/iXK6M0A3+UFF+CLmE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=AmwfTLGiuffGpk5emj5n5zyvS/U9odvo2eBmTpuumOpWxJbtDkiG4KJdnxhqQep9U 7d5W9JlrsoGnrH3eZfBw2dZ3EG4dS4xL6cIMQP74S8ghBigQhp7OHFG5AVypQKhDty QIKra76IUDQfEV3PqY4b1ndKnylnfg7hI4FuY3jg= From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: =?UTF-8?q?Rafa=C5=82=20Mi=C5=82ecki?= , Kalle Valo , Sasha Levin , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list.pdl@broadcom.com, brcm80211-dev-list@cypress.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 06/68] brcmutil: really fix decoding channel info for 160 MHz bandwidth Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2018 00:54:57 -0500 Message-Id: <20181129055559.159228-6-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20181129055559.159228-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20181129055559.159228-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org From: Rafał Miłecki [ Upstream commit 3401d42c7ea2d064d15c66698ff8eb96553179ce ] Previous commit /adding/ support for 160 MHz chanspecs was incomplete. It didn't set bandwidth info and didn't extract control channel info. As the result it was also using uninitialized "sb" var. This change has been tested for two chanspecs found to be reported by some devices/firmwares: 1) 60/160 (0xee32) Before: chnum:50 control_ch_num:36 After: chnum:50 control_ch_num:60 2) 120/160 (0xed72) Before: chnum:114 control_ch_num:100 After: chnum:114 control_ch_num:120 Fixes: 330994e8e8ec ("brcmfmac: fix for proper support of 160MHz bandwidth") Signed-off-by: Rafał Miłecki Signed-off-by: Kalle Valo Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c index e7584b842dce..eb5db94f5745 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/broadcom/brcm80211/brcmutil/d11.c @@ -193,6 +193,9 @@ static void brcmu_d11ac_decchspec(struct brcmu_chan *ch) } break; case BRCMU_CHSPEC_D11AC_BW_160: + ch->bw = BRCMU_CHAN_BW_160; + ch->sb = brcmu_maskget16(ch->chspec, BRCMU_CHSPEC_D11AC_SB_MASK, + BRCMU_CHSPEC_D11AC_SB_SHIFT); switch (ch->sb) { case BRCMU_CHAN_SB_LLL: ch->control_ch_num -= CH_70MHZ_APART; -- 2.17.1