From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 956EBC04EB9 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58AFA20989 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:38:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Cuptd3Jm" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 58AFA20989 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728258AbeLEJic (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 04:38:32 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:42348 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727737AbeLEJia (ORCPT ); Wed, 5 Dec 2018 04:38:30 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (unknown [213.57.143.11]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EF07820879; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:38:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544002709; bh=hYdXHR/b2MIZbDZpwGAtpofplpyVnAHSmuDaVyFvj+w=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Cuptd3JmTGg+er46K8KZirIpj2fO+TLUigfLVYv/UsWfXx8iwhN+fn1lLG7htDCPR BuG7l7oYmmHQyxbzeQaXO4r89NF82uRhtY0VEWA3CDRaxAJAw5K1JZW42vT3J5beU6 Y32+7omnuVcI7+qY6umqmg+DkD104qG6KXnc3+Hg= From: Sasha Levin To: stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Trent Piepho , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Bjorn Helgaas , Joao Pinto , Richard Zhu , Sasha Levin , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 045/123] PCI: imx6: Fix link training status detection in link up check Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2018 04:34:37 -0500 Message-Id: <20181205093555.5386-45-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20181205093555.5386-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20181205093555.5386-1-sashal@kernel.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Trent Piepho [ Upstream commit 68bc10bf992180f269816ff3d22eb30383138577 ] This bug was introduced in the interaction for two commits on either branch of the merge commit 562df5c8521e ("Merge branch 'pci/host-designware' into next"). Commit 4d107d3b5a68 ("PCI: imx6: Move link up check into imx6_pcie_wait_for_link()"), changed imx6_pcie_wait_for_link() to poll the link status register directly, checking for link up and not training, and made imx6_pcie_link_up() only check the link up bit (once, not a polling loop). While commit 886bc5ceb5cc ("PCI: designware: Add generic dw_pcie_wait_for_link()"), replaced the loop in imx6_pcie_wait_for_link() with a call to a new dwc core function, which polled imx6_pcie_link_up(), which still checked both link up and not training in a loop. When these two commits were merged, the version of imx6_pcie_wait_for_link() from 886bc5ceb5cc was kept, which eliminated the link training check placed there by 4d107d3b5a68. However, the version of imx6_pcie_link_up() from 4d107d3b5a68 was kept, which eliminated the link training check that had been there and was moved to imx6_pcie_wait_for_link(). The result was the link training check got lost for the imx6 driver. Eliminate imx6_pcie_link_up() so that the default handler, dw_pcie_link_up(), is used instead. The default handler has the correct code, which checks for link up and also that it still is not training, fixing the regression. Fixes: 562df5c8521e ("Merge branch 'pci/host-designware' into next") Signed-off-by: Trent Piepho [lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com: rewrote the commit log] Signed-off-by: Lorenzo Pieralisi Reviewed-by: Lucas Stach Cc: Bjorn Helgaas Cc: Joao Pinto Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi Cc: Richard Zhu Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c | 10 +--------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 9 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c index 4a9a673b4777..975050a69494 100644 --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-imx6.c @@ -80,8 +80,6 @@ struct imx6_pcie { #define PCIE_PL_PFLR_FORCE_LINK (1 << 15) #define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R0 (PL_OFFSET + 0x28) #define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1 (PL_OFFSET + 0x2c) -#define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_IN_TRAINING (1 << 29) -#define PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_UP (1 << 4) #define PCIE_PHY_CTRL (PL_OFFSET + 0x114) #define PCIE_PHY_CTRL_DATA_LOC 0 @@ -641,12 +639,6 @@ static int imx6_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) return 0; } -static int imx6_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci) -{ - return dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1) & - PCIE_PHY_DEBUG_R1_XMLH_LINK_UP; -} - static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops imx6_pcie_host_ops = { .host_init = imx6_pcie_host_init, }; @@ -679,7 +671,7 @@ static int imx6_add_pcie_port(struct imx6_pcie *imx6_pcie, } static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { - .link_up = imx6_pcie_link_up, + /* No special ops needed, but pcie-designware still expects this struct */ }; static int imx6_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) -- 2.17.1