From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> To: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Subject: [PATCH] mm, kmemleak: Little optimization while scanning Date: Thu, 6 Dec 2018 14:19:18 +0100 [thread overview] Message-ID: <20181206131918.25099-1-osalvador@suse.de> (raw) kmemleak_scan() goes through all online nodes and tries to scan all used pages. We can do better and use pfn_to_online_page(), so in case we have CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG, offlined pages will be skiped automatically. For boxes where CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG is not present, pfn_to_online_page() will fallback to pfn_valid(). Another little optimization is to check if the page belongs to the node we are currently checking, so in case we have nodes interleaved we will not check the same pfn multiple times. I ran some tests: Add some memory to node1 and node2 making it interleaved: (qemu) object_add memory-backend-ram,id=ram0,size=1G (qemu) device_add pc-dimm,id=dimm0,memdev=ram0,node=1 (qemu) object_add memory-backend-ram,id=ram1,size=1G (qemu) device_add pc-dimm,id=dimm1,memdev=ram1,node=2 (qemu) object_add memory-backend-ram,id=ram2,size=1G (qemu) device_add pc-dimm,id=dimm2,memdev=ram2,node=1 Then, we offline that memory: # for i in {32..39} ; do echo "offline" > /sys/devices/system/node/node1/memory$i/state;done # for i in {48..55} ; do echo "offline" > /sys/devices/system/node/node1/memory$i/state;don # for i in {40..47} ; do echo "offline" > /sys/devices/system/node/node2/memory$i/state;done And we run kmemleak_scan: # echo "scan" > /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak before the patch: kmemleak: time spend: 41596 us after the patch: kmemleak: time spend: 34899 us Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> --- mm/kmemleak.c | 10 +++++++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c index 877de4fa0720..5ce1e6a46d77 100644 --- a/mm/kmemleak.c +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ #include <linux/kmemleak.h> #include <linux/memory_hotplug.h> + /* * Kmemleak configuration and common defines. */ @@ -1547,11 +1548,14 @@ static void kmemleak_scan(void) unsigned long pfn; for (pfn = start_pfn; pfn < end_pfn; pfn++) { - struct page *page; + struct page *page = pfn_to_online_page(pfn); + + if (!page) + continue; - if (!pfn_valid(pfn)) + /* only scan pages belonging to this node */ + if (page_to_nid(page) != i) continue; - page = pfn_to_page(pfn); /* only scan if page is in use */ if (page_count(page) == 0) continue; -- 2.13.7
next reply other threads:[~2018-12-06 13:19 UTC|newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top 2018-12-06 13:19 Oscar Salvador [this message] 2018-12-07 4:15 ` Wei Yang 2018-12-07 6:14 ` Oscar Salvador 2018-12-07 9:26 ` Wei Yang 2018-12-07 6:06 ` Oscar Salvador 2018-12-07 9:48 ` Catalin Marinas
Reply instructions: You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email using any one of the following methods: * Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client, and reply-to-all from there: mbox Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style * Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to switches of git-send-email(1): git send-email \ --in-reply-to=20181206131918.25099-1-osalvador@suse.de \ --to=osalvador@suse.de \ --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \ --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \ --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \ --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \ --subject='Re: [PATCH] mm, kmemleak: Little optimization while scanning' \ /path/to/YOUR_REPLY https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html * If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
This is an external index of several public inboxes, see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror all data and code used by this external index.