From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Sasha Levin Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/25] arm64: Fix HCR.TGE status for NMI contexts Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:39:24 +0000 Message-ID: <20181212213925.BFE1020839@mail.kernel.org> References: <1544633245-6036-2-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0487969178506171221==" Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1544633245-6036-2-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Sasha Levin , Julien Thierry , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Cc: linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, James Morse List-Id: linux-arch.vger.kernel.org --===============0487969178506171221== Content-Type: text/plain Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.8, v4.14.87, v4.9.144, v4.4.166, v3.18.128, v4.19.8: Build failed! Errors: ./include/linux/hardirq.h:65:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_enter’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_enter’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ./include/linux/hardirq.h:84:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_exit’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_exit’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] v4.14.87: Build failed! Errors: ./include/linux/hardirq.h:65:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_enter’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_enter’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ./include/linux/hardirq.h:84:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_exit’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_exit’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] v4.9.144: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 096683724cb2 ("arm64: unwind: avoid percpu indirection for irq stack") 34be98f4944f ("arm64: kernel: remove {THREAD,IRQ_STACK}_START_SP") a9ea0017ebe8 ("arm64: factor out current_stack_pointer") c02433dd6de3 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack") c7365330753c ("arm64: unwind: disregard frame.sp when validating frame pointer") dbc9344a68e5 ("arm64: clean up THREAD_* definitions") f60ad4edcf07 ("arm64: clean up irq stack definitions") f60fe78f1332 ("arm64: use an irq stack pointer") v4.4.166: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 096683724cb2 ("arm64: unwind: avoid percpu indirection for irq stack") 0a8ea52c3eb1 ("arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature") 132cd887b5c5 ("arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stack") 1ffe199b1c9b ("arm64: when walking onto the task stack, check sp & fp are in current->stack") 20380bb390a4 ("arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer") 7596abf2e566 ("arm64: irq: fix walking from irq stack to task stack") 8e23dacd12a4 ("arm64: Add do_softirq_own_stack() and enable irq_stacks") 971c67ce37cf ("arm64: reduce stack use in irq_handler") a80a0eb70c35 ("arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust") c7365330753c ("arm64: unwind: disregard frame.sp when validating frame pointer") f60ad4edcf07 ("arm64: clean up irq stack definitions") f60fe78f1332 ("arm64: use an irq stack pointer") fe13f95b7200 ("arm64: pass a task parameter to unwind_frame()") v3.18.128: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 020295b4cb5b ("ACPI / processor: Make it possible to get CPU hardware ID via GICC") 132cd887b5c5 ("arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stack") 13ca62b243f6 ("ACPI: Fix minor syntax issues in processor_core.c") 37655163ce1a ("ARM64 / ACPI: Get RSDP and ACPI boot-time tables") 587064b610c7 ("arm64: Add framework for legacy instruction emulation") 652261a7a86c ("ACPI: fix acpi_os_ioremap for arm64") 828aef376d7a ("ACPI / processor: Introduce phys_cpuid_t for CPU hardware ID") 96f0e00378d4 ("ARM: add basic support for on-demand backtrace of other CPUs") af2c632e234f ("arm64/include/asm: Fixed a warning about 'struct pt_regs'") af8f3f514d19 ("ACPI / processor: Convert apic_id to phys_id to make it arch agnostic") b4ff8389ed14 ("xen/events: Always allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests") d02dc27db0dc ("ACPI / processor: Rename acpi_(un)map_lsapic() to acpi_(un)map_cpu()") d60fc3892c4d ("irqchip: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support") ecf5636dcd59 ("ACPI: Add interfaces to parse IOAPIC ID for IOAPIC hotplug") f60ad4edcf07 ("arm64: clean up irq stack definitions") f60fe78f1332 ("arm64: use an irq stack pointer") How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha --===============0487969178506171221== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============0487969178506171221==-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F65EC65BAF for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64EFE20839 for ; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:39:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="eKqsXgoP"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (1024-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="s7HEVM/V" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 64EFE20839 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: MIME-Version:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Message-Id:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From: Date:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=KxF1B3dOoTDctsp0lbNlb/8sFmsJPTvaaJqAnoAp3+g=; b=eKqsXgoPw+Yv3b b3iUkUdKXsMUnfP9Pe3Ky78Awk0QAkrR6OLwN6Yzlj+Rhknwd9WdURq9fI1SNctdpNrZbySweHAeb SCtzRCOog8DEnPwHQFMjfgysRzme8hf+pgz0afV/eoH661MlHeaG8bSnDoKBQyRoVXZ6dkGEKNURo 9REB300pMx4jhmDa1fFNbGeUSTp7PvHJ6rEQTLDRTA92Ncu8BwKkUCNJiqcKeH5Zq+iHbHekxZd7t 5b83+jgs93+a3tJD++IWFyLfgHzxxyn3TthsgZNBzmHUqUtTJS49vVxdfr7jJVUoCFdzVy7AK8c40 hqO1FOzcgS8IvbaX5jAA==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gXCEI-0001cq-Cj; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:39:42 +0000 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gXCED-0001cV-Vo for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:39:39 +0000 Received: from localhost (unknown [23.100.24.84]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BFE1020839; Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:39:25 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544650766; bh=+U9Z27M5bTLtI1HDuN25hUOMQFsUN1vjsFMUxUsbuNw=; h=Date:From:To:To:To:Cc:Cc:Cc:Cc:Cc:Cc:Cc:Cc:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To: References:From; b=s7HEVM/VmjRfkjX78AOP7DFq8Rn2RncX82wskyZs2qBFg7wsesqNzIPT+TkXNt7TL nFa031Pz2kwkf6gy7eXA/RP1a/l1f6up4ZH+nuPrqdOhpezbeKZiDDXrOYNPyH8bKh nhTbarfiKYNzpRAReJXNC3EtNsM3xmOXiNMjizak= Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2018 21:39:24 +0000 From: Sasha Levin To: Sasha Levin To: Julien Thierry To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 01/25] arm64: Fix HCR.TGE status for NMI contexts In-Reply-To: <1544633245-6036-2-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> References: <1544633245-6036-2-git-send-email-julien.thierry@arm.com> Message-Id: <20181212213925.BFE1020839@mail.kernel.org> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20181212_133938_059579_AEEBF5ED X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.19 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, daniel.thompson@linaro.org, Arnd Bergmann , Marc Zyngier , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, James Morse MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============0487969178506171221==" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --===============0487969178506171221== Content-Type: text/plain Hi, [This is an automated email] This commit has been processed because it contains a -stable tag. The stable tag indicates that it's relevant for the following trees: all The bot has tested the following trees: v4.19.8, v4.14.87, v4.9.144, v4.4.166, v3.18.128, v4.19.8: Build failed! Errors: ./include/linux/hardirq.h:65:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_enter’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_enter’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ./include/linux/hardirq.h:84:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_exit’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_exit’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] v4.14.87: Build failed! Errors: ./include/linux/hardirq.h:65:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_enter’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_enter’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] ./include/linux/hardirq.h:84:3: error: implicit declaration of function ‘arch_nmi_exit’; did you mean ‘rcu_nmi_exit’? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] v4.9.144: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 096683724cb2 ("arm64: unwind: avoid percpu indirection for irq stack") 34be98f4944f ("arm64: kernel: remove {THREAD,IRQ_STACK}_START_SP") a9ea0017ebe8 ("arm64: factor out current_stack_pointer") c02433dd6de3 ("arm64: split thread_info from task stack") c7365330753c ("arm64: unwind: disregard frame.sp when validating frame pointer") dbc9344a68e5 ("arm64: clean up THREAD_* definitions") f60ad4edcf07 ("arm64: clean up irq stack definitions") f60fe78f1332 ("arm64: use an irq stack pointer") v4.4.166: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 096683724cb2 ("arm64: unwind: avoid percpu indirection for irq stack") 0a8ea52c3eb1 ("arm64: Add HAVE_REGS_AND_STACK_ACCESS_API feature") 132cd887b5c5 ("arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stack") 1ffe199b1c9b ("arm64: when walking onto the task stack, check sp & fp are in current->stack") 20380bb390a4 ("arm64: ftrace: fix a stack tracer's output under function graph tracer") 7596abf2e566 ("arm64: irq: fix walking from irq stack to task stack") 8e23dacd12a4 ("arm64: Add do_softirq_own_stack() and enable irq_stacks") 971c67ce37cf ("arm64: reduce stack use in irq_handler") a80a0eb70c35 ("arm64: make irq_stack_ptr more robust") c7365330753c ("arm64: unwind: disregard frame.sp when validating frame pointer") f60ad4edcf07 ("arm64: clean up irq stack definitions") f60fe78f1332 ("arm64: use an irq stack pointer") fe13f95b7200 ("arm64: pass a task parameter to unwind_frame()") v3.18.128: Failed to apply! Possible dependencies: 020295b4cb5b ("ACPI / processor: Make it possible to get CPU hardware ID via GICC") 132cd887b5c5 ("arm64: Modify stack trace and dump for use with irq_stack") 13ca62b243f6 ("ACPI: Fix minor syntax issues in processor_core.c") 37655163ce1a ("ARM64 / ACPI: Get RSDP and ACPI boot-time tables") 587064b610c7 ("arm64: Add framework for legacy instruction emulation") 652261a7a86c ("ACPI: fix acpi_os_ioremap for arm64") 828aef376d7a ("ACPI / processor: Introduce phys_cpuid_t for CPU hardware ID") 96f0e00378d4 ("ARM: add basic support for on-demand backtrace of other CPUs") af2c632e234f ("arm64/include/asm: Fixed a warning about 'struct pt_regs'") af8f3f514d19 ("ACPI / processor: Convert apic_id to phys_id to make it arch agnostic") b4ff8389ed14 ("xen/events: Always allocate legacy interrupts on PV guests") d02dc27db0dc ("ACPI / processor: Rename acpi_(un)map_lsapic() to acpi_(un)map_cpu()") d60fc3892c4d ("irqchip: Add GICv2 specific ACPI boot support") ecf5636dcd59 ("ACPI: Add interfaces to parse IOAPIC ID for IOAPIC hotplug") f60ad4edcf07 ("arm64: clean up irq stack definitions") f60fe78f1332 ("arm64: use an irq stack pointer") How should we proceed with this patch? -- Thanks, Sasha --===============0487969178506171221== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel --===============0487969178506171221==--