From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Subject: Re: [PATCH] vhost: return EINVAL if iovecs size does not match the message size Date: Thu, 13 Dec 2018 14:55:17 -0500 Message-ID: <20181213143426-mutt-send-email-mst__12586.1729532064$1544730811$gmane$org@kernel.org> References: <20181213145350.5454-1-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181213145350.5454-1-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org Errors-To: virtualization-bounces@lists.linux-foundation.org To: Pavel Tikhomirov Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux-foundation.org, Konstantin Khorenko List-Id: virtualization@lists.linuxfoundation.org On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 05:53:50PM +0300, Pavel Tikhomirov wrote: > We've failed to copy and process vhost_iotlb_msg so let userspace at > least know about it. For instance before these patch the code below runs > without any error: > > int main() > { > struct vhost_msg msg; > struct iovec iov; > int fd; > > fd = open("/dev/vhost-net", O_RDWR); > if (fd == -1) { > perror("open"); > return 1; > } > > iov.iov_base = &msg; > iov.iov_len = sizeof(msg)-4; > > if (writev(fd, &iov,1) == -1) { > perror("writev"); > return 1; > } > > return 0; > } > > Signed-off-by: Pavel Tikhomirov Thanks for the patch! > --- > drivers/vhost/vhost.c | 8 ++++++-- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > index 3a5f81a66d34..03014224ef13 100644 > --- a/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > +++ b/drivers/vhost/vhost.c > @@ -1024,8 +1024,10 @@ ssize_t vhost_chr_write_iter(struct vhost_dev *dev, > int type, ret; > > ret = copy_from_iter(&type, sizeof(type), from); > - if (ret != sizeof(type)) > + if (ret != sizeof(type)) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > goto done; > + } > > switch (type) { > case VHOST_IOTLB_MSG: should this be EFAULT rather? > @@ -1044,8 +1046,10 @@ ssize_t vhost_chr_write_iter(struct vhost_dev *dev, > > iov_iter_advance(from, offset); > ret = copy_from_iter(&msg, sizeof(msg), from); > - if (ret != sizeof(msg)) > + if (ret != sizeof(msg)) { > + ret = -EINVAL; > goto done; > + } > if (vhost_process_iotlb_msg(dev, &msg)) { > ret = -EFAULT; > goto done; This too? > -- > 2.17.1