From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A30CC67839 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0BD1520892 for ; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:29:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544790569; bh=hv3/7h1OXeNp7kmyj+RK53GhvYYX8ndW5G5CkktlAHY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=mux8hRk7C1nrnnnDqnPIj7vZ0m5/g5nZiujScKdd1EOorAETrRwmtIL4zxkLOc5m8 SU845SmeWfa0YMxy2Ii3GCWj5Eus5Np50OIHOCiZmUXiTTMfw6fwDmnVtf7Zbwdu9g VJr65A47YgBImItC9gbqfLjH13wH3ZdNrJZ3O71c= DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 0BD1520892 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linuxfoundation.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731866AbeLNM32 (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:29:28 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:56594 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731618AbeLNMKf (ORCPT ); Fri, 14 Dec 2018 07:10:35 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A2032214D9; Fri, 14 Dec 2018 12:10:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1544789434; bh=hv3/7h1OXeNp7kmyj+RK53GhvYYX8ndW5G5CkktlAHY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Wv2SgFo9NuzSZqJCq6gE76h4VniiSC2M8Qg5A1zzBc2SfuOc4lmTLWR6nw8qZLrI3 G1JpD6tv7GpsbSO8K8XMJpymWi6I6bOioUrsDTDJ+fw69SpKVYxNqu+OBQZPA2b6DI PNOxjSzHRhUQYC3G+zHSQ1vcj4oAN/KrYeBgHo+8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Cong Wang , Dave Hansen , Johannes Weiner , Mel Gorman , Michal Hocko , Vlastimil Babka , Peter Zijlstra , Linus Torvalds , Jan Kara , Mathieu Desnoyers , Tetsuo Handa , rostedt@home.goodmis.org, Byungchul Park , Tejun Heo , Pavel Machek , "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" , Sergey Senozhatsky , Petr Mladek , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 4.14 81/89] printk: Hide console waiter logic into helpers Date: Fri, 14 Dec 2018 13:00:34 +0100 Message-Id: <20181214115733.691218749@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.0 In-Reply-To: <20181214115729.658859279@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20181214115729.658859279@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ [ Upstream commit c162d5b4338d72deed61aa65ed0f2f4ba2bbc8ab ] The commit ("printk: Add console owner and waiter logic to load balance console writes") made vprintk_emit() and console_unlock() even more complicated. This patch extracts the new code into 3 helper functions. They should help to keep it rather self-contained. It will be easier to use and maintain. This patch just shuffles the existing code. It does not change the functionality. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180112160837.GD24497@linux.suse Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org Cc: Cong Wang Cc: Dave Hansen Cc: Johannes Weiner Cc: Mel Gorman Cc: Michal Hocko Cc: Vlastimil Babka Cc: Peter Zijlstra Cc: Linus Torvalds Cc: Jan Kara Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers Cc: Tetsuo Handa Cc: rostedt@home.goodmis.org Cc: Byungchul Park Cc: Tejun Heo Cc: Pavel Machek Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Reviewed-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) Acked-by: Sergey Senozhatsky Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- kernel/printk/printk.c | 245 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------- 1 file changed, 148 insertions(+), 97 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/printk/printk.c b/kernel/printk/printk.c index b88b402444d6..2d1c2700bd85 100644 --- a/kernel/printk/printk.c +++ b/kernel/printk/printk.c @@ -86,15 +86,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(console_drivers); static struct lockdep_map console_lock_dep_map = { .name = "console_lock" }; -static struct lockdep_map console_owner_dep_map = { - .name = "console_owner" -}; #endif -static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(console_owner_lock); -static struct task_struct *console_owner; -static bool console_waiter; - enum devkmsg_log_bits { __DEVKMSG_LOG_BIT_ON = 0, __DEVKMSG_LOG_BIT_OFF, @@ -1555,6 +1548,146 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE3(syslog, int, type, char __user *, buf, int, len) return do_syslog(type, buf, len, SYSLOG_FROM_READER); } +/* + * Special console_lock variants that help to reduce the risk of soft-lockups. + * They allow to pass console_lock to another printk() call using a busy wait. + */ + +#ifdef CONFIG_LOCKDEP +static struct lockdep_map console_owner_dep_map = { + .name = "console_owner" +}; +#endif + +static DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(console_owner_lock); +static struct task_struct *console_owner; +static bool console_waiter; + +/** + * console_lock_spinning_enable - mark beginning of code where another + * thread might safely busy wait + * + * This basically converts console_lock into a spinlock. This marks + * the section where the console_lock owner can not sleep, because + * there may be a waiter spinning (like a spinlock). Also it must be + * ready to hand over the lock at the end of the section. + */ +static void console_lock_spinning_enable(void) +{ + raw_spin_lock(&console_owner_lock); + console_owner = current; + raw_spin_unlock(&console_owner_lock); + + /* The waiter may spin on us after setting console_owner */ + spin_acquire(&console_owner_dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); +} + +/** + * console_lock_spinning_disable_and_check - mark end of code where another + * thread was able to busy wait and check if there is a waiter + * + * This is called at the end of the section where spinning is allowed. + * It has two functions. First, it is a signal that it is no longer + * safe to start busy waiting for the lock. Second, it checks if + * there is a busy waiter and passes the lock rights to her. + * + * Important: Callers lose the lock if there was a busy waiter. + * They must not touch items synchronized by console_lock + * in this case. + * + * Return: 1 if the lock rights were passed, 0 otherwise. + */ +static int console_lock_spinning_disable_and_check(void) +{ + int waiter; + + raw_spin_lock(&console_owner_lock); + waiter = READ_ONCE(console_waiter); + console_owner = NULL; + raw_spin_unlock(&console_owner_lock); + + if (!waiter) { + spin_release(&console_owner_dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); + return 0; + } + + /* The waiter is now free to continue */ + WRITE_ONCE(console_waiter, false); + + spin_release(&console_owner_dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); + + /* + * Hand off console_lock to waiter. The waiter will perform + * the up(). After this, the waiter is the console_lock owner. + */ + mutex_release(&console_lock_dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); + return 1; +} + +/** + * console_trylock_spinning - try to get console_lock by busy waiting + * + * This allows to busy wait for the console_lock when the current + * owner is running in specially marked sections. It means that + * the current owner is running and cannot reschedule until it + * is ready to lose the lock. + * + * Return: 1 if we got the lock, 0 othrewise + */ +static int console_trylock_spinning(void) +{ + struct task_struct *owner = NULL; + bool waiter; + bool spin = false; + unsigned long flags; + + if (console_trylock()) + return 1; + + printk_safe_enter_irqsave(flags); + + raw_spin_lock(&console_owner_lock); + owner = READ_ONCE(console_owner); + waiter = READ_ONCE(console_waiter); + if (!waiter && owner && owner != current) { + WRITE_ONCE(console_waiter, true); + spin = true; + } + raw_spin_unlock(&console_owner_lock); + + /* + * If there is an active printk() writing to the + * consoles, instead of having it write our data too, + * see if we can offload that load from the active + * printer, and do some printing ourselves. + * Go into a spin only if there isn't already a waiter + * spinning, and there is an active printer, and + * that active printer isn't us (recursive printk?). + */ + if (!spin) { + printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags); + return 0; + } + + /* We spin waiting for the owner to release us */ + spin_acquire(&console_owner_dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); + /* Owner will clear console_waiter on hand off */ + while (READ_ONCE(console_waiter)) + cpu_relax(); + spin_release(&console_owner_dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); + + printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags); + /* + * The owner passed the console lock to us. + * Since we did not spin on console lock, annotate + * this as a trylock. Otherwise lockdep will + * complain. + */ + mutex_acquire(&console_lock_dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_); + + return 1; +} + /* * Call the console drivers, asking them to write out * log_buf[start] to log_buf[end - 1]. @@ -1774,56 +1907,8 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level, * semaphore. The release will print out buffers and wake up * /dev/kmsg and syslog() users. */ - if (console_trylock()) { + if (console_trylock_spinning()) console_unlock(); - } else { - struct task_struct *owner = NULL; - bool waiter; - bool spin = false; - - printk_safe_enter_irqsave(flags); - - raw_spin_lock(&console_owner_lock); - owner = READ_ONCE(console_owner); - waiter = READ_ONCE(console_waiter); - if (!waiter && owner && owner != current) { - WRITE_ONCE(console_waiter, true); - spin = true; - } - raw_spin_unlock(&console_owner_lock); - - /* - * If there is an active printk() writing to the - * consoles, instead of having it write our data too, - * see if we can offload that load from the active - * printer, and do some printing ourselves. - * Go into a spin only if there isn't already a waiter - * spinning, and there is an active printer, and - * that active printer isn't us (recursive printk?). - */ - if (spin) { - /* We spin waiting for the owner to release us */ - spin_acquire(&console_owner_dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); - /* Owner will clear console_waiter on hand off */ - while (READ_ONCE(console_waiter)) - cpu_relax(); - - spin_release(&console_owner_dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); - printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags); - - /* - * The owner passed the console lock to us. - * Since we did not spin on console lock, annotate - * this as a trylock. Otherwise lockdep will - * complain. - */ - mutex_acquire(&console_lock_dep_map, 0, 1, _THIS_IP_); - console_unlock(); - printk_safe_enter_irqsave(flags); - } - printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags); - - } } return printed_len; @@ -1924,6 +2009,8 @@ static ssize_t msg_print_ext_header(char *buf, size_t size, static ssize_t msg_print_ext_body(char *buf, size_t size, char *dict, size_t dict_len, char *text, size_t text_len) { return 0; } +static void console_lock_spinning_enable(void) { } +static int console_lock_spinning_disable_and_check(void) { return 0; } static void call_console_drivers(const char *ext_text, size_t ext_len, const char *text, size_t len) {} static size_t msg_print_text(const struct printk_log *msg, @@ -2210,7 +2297,6 @@ void console_unlock(void) static u64 seen_seq; unsigned long flags; bool wake_klogd = false; - bool waiter = false; bool do_cond_resched, retry; if (console_suspended) { @@ -2305,31 +2391,16 @@ void console_unlock(void) * finish. This task can not be preempted if there is a * waiter waiting to take over. */ - raw_spin_lock(&console_owner_lock); - console_owner = current; - raw_spin_unlock(&console_owner_lock); - - /* The waiter may spin on us after setting console_owner */ - spin_acquire(&console_owner_dep_map, 0, 0, _THIS_IP_); + console_lock_spinning_enable(); stop_critical_timings(); /* don't trace print latency */ call_console_drivers(ext_text, ext_len, text, len); start_critical_timings(); - raw_spin_lock(&console_owner_lock); - waiter = READ_ONCE(console_waiter); - console_owner = NULL; - raw_spin_unlock(&console_owner_lock); - - /* - * If there is a waiter waiting for us, then pass the - * rest of the work load over to that waiter. - */ - if (waiter) - break; - - /* There was no waiter, and nothing will spin on us here */ - spin_release(&console_owner_dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); + if (console_lock_spinning_disable_and_check()) { + printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags); + return; + } printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags); @@ -2337,26 +2408,6 @@ void console_unlock(void) cond_resched(); } - /* - * If there is an active waiter waiting on the console_lock. - * Pass off the printing to the waiter, and the waiter - * will continue printing on its CPU, and when all writing - * has finished, the last printer will wake up klogd. - */ - if (waiter) { - WRITE_ONCE(console_waiter, false); - /* The waiter is now free to continue */ - spin_release(&console_owner_dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); - /* - * Hand off console_lock to waiter. The waiter will perform - * the up(). After this, the waiter is the console_lock owner. - */ - mutex_release(&console_lock_dep_map, 1, _THIS_IP_); - printk_safe_exit_irqrestore(flags); - /* Note, if waiter is set, logbuf_lock is not held */ - return; - } - console_locked = 0; /* Release the exclusive_console once it is used */ -- 2.19.1