From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52152) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZx5P-0005io-7h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 07:05:55 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZx5J-0001Zi-RY for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 07:05:55 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32878) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gZx5J-0001Xk-LR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 20 Dec 2018 07:05:49 -0500 Date: Thu, 20 Dec 2018 10:05:44 -0200 From: Eduardo Habkost Message-ID: <20181220120544.GL19442@habkost.net> References: <20181126135958.20956-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> <878t1chzj8.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20181130183608.GQ18284@habkost.net> <871s6yy9st.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> <20181204180808.GC18284@habkost.net> <875zvpl98t.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <875zvpl98t.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] i386/kvm: expose HV_CPUID_ENLIGHTMENT_INFO.EAX and HV_CPUID_NESTED_FEATURES.EAX as feature words List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Vitaly Kuznetsov Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Roman Kagan , Marcelo Tosatti , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Richard Henderson On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 06:25:06PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > Eduardo Habkost writes: > > > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:17:06PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote: > >> Eduardo Habkost writes: > > [...] > >> > But note that we might still be able to move the existing > >> > "hyperv_*" features to feature_word_info[].feat_names. We just > >> > need to keep the same semantics (e.g. enable > >> > HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE automatically when some features are set). > >> > > >> > Maybe we can make some of the feature properties read-only. This > >> > way we can give them meaningful names for debugging and error > >> > messages, even if we don't want to make them configurable > >> > directly. > >> > >> I'd suggest (if there are no objections of course) we do this separately > >> from this patch. [...] > > > > Agreed. > > > > Paolo, Eduardo, > > in case there are no concerns here, could you please pick this patch up? > Thanks! Queued, thanks! Can you please send the comment you wrote about feat_names as a follow-up patch? -- Eduardo