From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7AC4C43387 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873DD20882 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:47:17 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="pLpLlsu7" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729017AbeL0NrN (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Dec 2018 08:47:13 -0500 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:43372 "EHLO aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727429AbeL0NrM (ORCPT ); Thu, 27 Dec 2018 08:47:12 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wBRDd30u050865; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:41:10 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=wWhlKvi6DYO/+w7JYjA/SNhf/XJAF2jtuIRmY0IuZj4=; b=pLpLlsu7wAnzIkELBQItlkruOcNnB9iJ3uXpebHwioUiJxQ1DDDMwth+uHf2+MF+A5We nj9KTNHdA7E7/qdaioAPmfta88TiY/cWfqhbU+DqbdpuJBW6S0K8hs2NQpBW22TGLNjP w+zkwr/gNluxEunFCkDABo/dN0Y4BZy8IYv+8ba3xrIebAAjT1Lnpfa5/d1MoXelqmNG xJuOEkpVEa+6ca8MhwaWsPcEHzCb6CFq7Zmsote4JmrENcGPgE0N6dMwO9XLwGU4vAM3 vAXCHmSqLps+zZ/QWYuOuWOI9e9epAlBxvpHKm+v2eU2o3vS2FuiRBOF5k1+a6dE4ANo Lw== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2phasdwfjk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:41:10 +0000 Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBRDfAD1032512 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:41:10 GMT Received: from abhmp0018.oracle.com (abhmp0018.oracle.com [141.146.116.24]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wBRDf940020543; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:41:09 GMT Received: from kadam (/197.157.34.167) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 05:41:08 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:40:55 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Tom Psyborg Cc: Julia Lawall , Andy Shevchenko , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Dan Williams , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD Message-ID: <20181227134055.GA2272@kadam> References: <1545555435-24576-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9118 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=656 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812270124 Sender: linux-wireless-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > more than enough > I don't know who you were discussing this with... You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a clear rule. For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. regards, dan carpenter PS: Please, no more top posting. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:40:55 +0300 Message-ID: <20181227134055.GA2272@kadam> References: <1545555435-24576-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Tom Psyborg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Dan Williams , Andy Shevchenko , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > more than enough > I don't know who you were discussing this with... You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a clear rule. For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. regards, dan carpenter PS: Please, no more top posting. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Dan Carpenter Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:40:55 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD Message-Id: <20181227134055.GA2272@kadam> List-Id: References: <1545555435-24576-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Tom Psyborg Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Dan Williams , Andy Shevchenko , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > more than enough > I don't know who you were discussing this with... You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a clear rule. For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. regards, dan carpenter PS: Please, no more top posting. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16D13C43387 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:47:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D7F2220882 for ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:47:23 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="RENJ1r3v"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="pLpLlsu7" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org D7F2220882 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:References: Message-ID:Subject:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=KbKfAQm6TBKpb7s4lrhVIpGAdl5Jt/goYvvPNxTc8s4=; b=RENJ1r3vebwp27 zJfH02JGlbOqsuWJxTM9XL3XJFCDPRHaju4Dd9l/H2xKSZGYlCVV3DZJBgonv3Z28YE7tAzNMDRTa YdgLSkAq+RAHVtSRIN2c81CBeyI1GHaFEsxuR7WbAtoytM6BM9eWW2f7hCmCE4lAq9+C1gp70tarH /GadQ9omQxzCWndxUdCX3Z6CryiA4pe8lw1jW7+00iwU+hdrcgqTtvPvDK/kGR4MoW5uDJRmkSTiB +3HBE7ajNqXsgROEapveiL70VeYjH4AJUbiph53UnNAOpxvZmMB2wcCLVze4Y5fB1vA439xqgoSLe mU9RQCJePzWmGQJc6nsg==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gcW0F-0002yc-Bo; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:47:11 +0000 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gcW0B-0002y1-0D for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:47:08 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id wBRDd30u050865; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:41:10 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=date : from : to : cc : subject : message-id : references : mime-version : content-type : in-reply-to; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=wWhlKvi6DYO/+w7JYjA/SNhf/XJAF2jtuIRmY0IuZj4=; b=pLpLlsu7wAnzIkELBQItlkruOcNnB9iJ3uXpebHwioUiJxQ1DDDMwth+uHf2+MF+A5We nj9KTNHdA7E7/qdaioAPmfta88TiY/cWfqhbU+DqbdpuJBW6S0K8hs2NQpBW22TGLNjP w+zkwr/gNluxEunFCkDABo/dN0Y4BZy8IYv+8ba3xrIebAAjT1Lnpfa5/d1MoXelqmNG xJuOEkpVEa+6ca8MhwaWsPcEHzCb6CFq7Zmsote4JmrENcGPgE0N6dMwO9XLwGU4vAM3 vAXCHmSqLps+zZ/QWYuOuWOI9e9epAlBxvpHKm+v2eU2o3vS2FuiRBOF5k1+a6dE4ANo Lw== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2phasdwfjk-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:41:10 +0000 Received: from aserv0121.oracle.com (aserv0121.oracle.com [141.146.126.235]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id wBRDfAD1032512 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:41:10 GMT Received: from abhmp0018.oracle.com (abhmp0018.oracle.com [141.146.116.24]) by aserv0121.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.13.8) with ESMTP id wBRDf940020543; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 13:41:09 GMT Received: from kadam (/197.157.34.167) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 27 Dec 2018 05:41:08 -0800 Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2018 16:40:55 +0300 From: Dan Carpenter To: Tom Psyborg Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/20] drop useless LIST_HEAD Message-ID: <20181227134055.GA2272@kadam> References: <1545555435-24576-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@lip6.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9118 signatures=668680 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=656 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1812270124 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20181227_054707_136001_8D7241A3 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 18.78 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org, Stefano Stabellini , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Dan Williams , Andy Shevchenko , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 11:12:20PM +0100, Tom Psyborg wrote: > there was discussion about this just some days ago. CC 4-5 lists is > more than enough > I don't know who you were discussing this with... You should CC the 0th patch to all the mailinglists. That much is a clear rule. For the rest, Julia's position is the more conservative one. I was in a conversation in RL and they were like, "CC everyone for all the patches". It depends on the context, of course. If the patches are dependent on each other then you *have* to CC everyone for everything. If we really have other clear rules, then it should be encoded into get_maintainer.pl so that it's automatic. My other question is why do the linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org people feel like they need to be CC'd about every driver??? I always remove them from the CC list unless it's an arch/arm issue. regards, dan carpenter PS: Please, no more top posting. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel