From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDE38C43387 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 09:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DBFE20855 for ; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 09:07:04 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="QvM6Q14T" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726035AbeL3JHD (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2018 04:07:03 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:34022 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726006AbeL3JHD (ORCPT ); Sun, 30 Dec 2018 04:07:03 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Ya7Ovsd1iNircJb+H2ZNRkZATC5DHDHfQwaCnup1ihI=; b=QvM6Q14TurZyIT21EdDig8khx Ev1ZBZZ8CZ5AfzRPCvC+2nqJv1aeEb6YfESQ30ioM0IziRcihhJmkmK7ZnNVFd5bECww/U8ql3UP9 y2FgVnVwIltXoq2VQ4sSdP1MC8eYrh8gFZRu54BNRrmt2jN/zc984DGM0uoLJAxvh6GyOZkzkyD9F XIhoe3/4Yvh0yMThv0ESxeDIf4zSZ5Bim6Xwbfud8SfrekMxUvFArq1KBG0Z0yPzn9ULkXf7kNZ1A SyUKfgsvbSpu9GA5x2Np4NiR4x+gU47jolbN69JPg2zEu09mHkXK9XB354cJVR/3EZuOiHh1ljxqr JJqAJ6ybw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gdX3W-0001yd-LD; Sun, 30 Dec 2018 09:06:46 +0000 Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 01:06:46 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Linus Torvalds , dm-devel@redhat.com, linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Alasdair G Kergon , AliOS system security , Colin Ian King , Eric Biggers , Heinz Mauelshagen , Jaegeuk Kim , Mikulas Patocka , Milan Broz , Nikos Tsironis , Shenghui Wang , Sweet Tea , wuzhouhui Subject: Re: [git pull] device mapper changes for 4.21 Message-ID: <20181230090646.GB1022@infradead.org> References: <20181227160944.GA12190@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181227160944.GA12190@redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-block-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:09:44AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > - Fix various DM targets to check for device sector overflow if > CONFIG_LBDAF is not set. Question to Jens and Linus: is there any good reason to keep the CONFIG_LBDAF=n option around? Less than 2gig block devices seem to be an absolutele niche, and I wonder if it is still worth maintaining the special case just for that. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [git pull] device mapper changes for 4.21 Date: Sun, 30 Dec 2018 01:06:46 -0800 Message-ID: <20181230090646.GB1022@infradead.org> References: <20181227160944.GA12190@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20181227160944.GA12190@redhat.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com Errors-To: dm-devel-bounces@redhat.com To: Mike Snitzer Cc: Sweet Tea , wuzhouhui , AliOS system security , Nikos Tsironis , Eric Biggers , Heinz Mauelshagen , Shenghui Wang , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@redhat.com, Mikulas Patocka , Jaegeuk Kim , Colin Ian King , Linus Torvalds , Milan Broz , Alasdair G Kergon List-Id: dm-devel.ids On Thu, Dec 27, 2018 at 11:09:44AM -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote: > - Fix various DM targets to check for device sector overflow if > CONFIG_LBDAF is not set. Question to Jens and Linus: is there any good reason to keep the CONFIG_LBDAF=n option around? Less than 2gig block devices seem to be an absolutele niche, and I wonder if it is still worth maintaining the special case just for that.