From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org. [2607:7c80:54:e::133]) by gmr-mx.google.com with ESMTPS id r7si78254pls.0.2019.01.17.07.19.25 for (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:19:25 -0800 (PST) Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2019 07:19:20 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] Virtio-over-PCIe on non-MIC Message-ID: <20190117151920.GA20359@infradead.org> References: <20190116163253.23780-1-vincent.whitchurch@axis.com> <20190117105441.eqediwlekofp2srg@axis.com> <20190117151529.GA3471@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190117151529.GA3471@infradead.org> To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Vincent Whitchurch , sudeep.dutt@intel.com, ashutosh.dixit@intel.com, gregkh , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Kishon Vijay Abraham I , Lorenzo Pieralisi , linux-pci , linux-ntb@googlegroups.com, Jon Mason , Dave Jiang , Allen Hubbe List-ID: On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 07:15:29AM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 01:39:27PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > Can you describe how you expect a VOP device over NTB or > > PCIe-endpoint would get created, configured and used? > > Is there always one master side that is responsible for creating > > virtio devices on it, with the slave side automatically attaching to > > them, or can either side create virtio devices? Is there any limit on > > the number of virtio devices or queues within a VOP device? > > For VOP device over NTB your configure your device using configfs > on one side, and for the other side it will just show up like any > other PCIe device, because it is. Sorry, I mean over the PCI-EP infratructure of course. NTB actually is rather hairy and complicated.