From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jason Gunthorpe Subject: [PATCH v5] coding-style: Clarify the expectations around bool Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2019 15:50:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20190118225047.GH4759@ziepe.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Cc: Gal Pressman , Bart Van Assche , Stephen Warren , Tariq Toukan , xavier.huwei@huawei.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org, Doug Ledford , Stephen Warren , Christoph Hellwig , Andrew Morton , Linus Torvalds , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org There has been some confusion since checkpatch started warning about bool use in structures, and people have been avoiding using it. Many people feel there is still a legitimate place for bool in structures, so provide some guidance on bool usage derived from the entire thread that spawned the checkpatch warning. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/CA+55aFwVZk1OfB9T2v014PTAKFhtVan_Zj2dOjnCy3x6E4UJfA@mail.gmail.com Signed-off-by: Joe Perches Acked-by: Joe Perches Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche Acked-by: Jani Nikula Reviewed-by: Joey Pabalinas Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe --- Documentation/process/coding-style.rst | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++--- scripts/checkpatch.pl | 13 --------- 2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) v5: - Wording updates from JoeyP, MatthewW, FedericoV diff --git a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst index b78dd680c03809..de889deaf29c42 100644 --- a/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst +++ b/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst @@ -921,7 +921,37 @@ result. Typical examples would be functions that return pointers; they use NULL or the ERR_PTR mechanism to report failure. -17) Don't re-invent the kernel macros +17) Using bool +-------------- + +The Linux kernel bool type is an alias for the C99 _Bool type. bool values can +only evaluate to 0 or 1, and implicit or explicit conversion to bool +automatically converts the value to true or false. When using bool types the +!! construction is not needed, which eliminates a class of bugs. + +When working with bool values the true and false definitions should be used +instead of 1 and 0. + +bool function return types and stack variables are always fine to use whenever +appropriate. Use of bool is encouraged to improve readability and is often a +better option than 'int' for storing boolean values. + +Do not use bool if cache line layout or size of the value matters, as its size +and alignment varies based on the compiled architecture. Structures that are +optimized for alignment and size should not use bool. + +If a structure has many true/false values, consider consolidating them into a +bitfield with 1 bit members, or using an appropriate fixed width type, such as +u8. + +Similarly for function arguments, many true/false values can be consolidated +into a single bitwise 'flags' argument and 'flags' can often be a more +readable alternative if the call-sites have naked true/false constants. + +Otherwise limited use of bool in structures and arguments can improve +readability. + +18) Don't re-invent the kernel macros ------------------------------------- The header file include/linux/kernel.h contains a number of macros that @@ -944,7 +974,7 @@ need them. Feel free to peruse that header file to see what else is already defined that you shouldn't reproduce in your code. -18) Editor modelines and other cruft +19) Editor modelines and other cruft ------------------------------------ Some editors can interpret configuration information embedded in source files, @@ -978,7 +1008,7 @@ own custom mode, or may have some other magic method for making indentation work correctly. -19) Inline assembly +20) Inline assembly ------------------- In architecture-specific code, you may need to use inline assembly to interface @@ -1010,7 +1040,7 @@ the next instruction in the assembly output: : /* outputs */ : /* inputs */ : /* clobbers */); -20) Conditional Compilation +21) Conditional Compilation --------------------------- Wherever possible, don't use preprocessor conditionals (#if, #ifdef) in .c diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl index b737ca9d720441..d62abd032885a1 100755 --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl @@ -6368,19 +6368,6 @@ sub process { } } -# check for bool bitfields - if ($sline =~ /^.\s+bool\s*$Ident\s*:\s*\d+\s*;/) { - WARN("BOOL_BITFIELD", - "Avoid using bool as bitfield. Prefer bool bitfields as unsigned int or u<8|16|32>\n" . $herecurr); - } - -# check for bool use in .h files - if ($realfile =~ /\.h$/ && - $sline =~ /^.\s+bool\s*$Ident\s*(?::\s*d+\s*)?;/) { - CHK("BOOL_MEMBER", - "Avoid using bool structure members because of possible alignment issues - see: https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/21/384\n" . $herecurr); - } - # check for semaphores initialized locked if ($line =~ /^.\s*sema_init.+,\W?0\W?\)/) { WARN("CONSIDER_COMPLETION", -- 2.20.1