From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andre Przywara Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2019 09:38:31 +0000 Subject: [U-Boot] [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/9] sunxi: clk: A80: add MMC clock support In-Reply-To: References: <20190119013055.28023-1-andre.przywara@arm.com> <20190119013055.28023-3-andre.przywara@arm.com> Message-ID: <20190121093831.480b1ca1@donnerap.cambridge.arm.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Mon, 21 Jan 2019 17:34:25 +0800 Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > On Mon, Jan 21, 2019 at 5:32 PM Jagan Teki > wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 7:02 AM Andre Przywara > > wrote: > > > > > > The A80 handles resets and clock gates for the MMC devices > > > differently, outside of the CCU IP block. Consequently we have a > > > separate clock device with a separate binding for that. > > > > > > Implement that with the respective clock gates and resets to > > > allow the A80 taking part in the DM_MMC game. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara > > > --- > > > drivers/clk/sunxi/clk_a80.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++- > > > 1 file changed, 27 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk_a80.c > > > b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk_a80.c index d6dd6a1fa1..2bfc2ca9f5 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk_a80.c > > > +++ b/drivers/clk/sunxi/clk_a80.c > > > @@ -30,19 +30,45 @@ static const struct ccu_reset a80_resets[] = { > > > [RST_BUS_UART5] = RESET(0x5b4, BIT(21)), > > > }; > > > > > > +static const struct ccu_clk_gate a80_mmc_gates[] = { > > > + [0] = GATE(0x0, BIT(16)), > > > + [1] = GATE(0x4, BIT(16)), > > > + [2] = GATE(0x8, BIT(16)), > > > + [3] = GATE(0xc, BIT(16)), > > > +}; > > > + > > > +static const struct ccu_reset a80_mmc_resets[] = { > > > + [0] = GATE(0x0, BIT(18)), > > > + [1] = GATE(0x4, BIT(18)), > > > + [2] = GATE(0x8, BIT(18)), > > > + [3] = GATE(0xc, BIT(18)), > > > +}; > > > + > > > static const struct ccu_desc a80_ccu_desc = { > > > .gates = a80_gates, > > > .resets = a80_resets, > > > }; > > > > > > +static const struct ccu_desc a80_mmc_clk_desc = { > > > + .gates = a80_mmc_gates, > > > + .resets = a80_mmc_resets, > > > +}; > > > + > > > static int a80_clk_bind(struct udevice *dev) > > > { > > > - return sunxi_reset_bind(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(a80_resets)); > > > + ulong count = ARRAY_SIZE(a80_resets); > > > + > > > + if (device_is_compatible(dev, > > > "allwinner,allwinner,sun9i-a80-mmc")) > > > + count = ARRAY_SIZE(a80_mmc_resets); > > > + > > > + return sunxi_reset_bind(dev, count); > > > } > > > > > > static const struct udevice_id a80_ccu_ids[] = { > > > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun9i-a80-ccu", > > > .data = (ulong)&a80_ccu_desc }, > > > + { .compatible = "allwinner,allwinner,sun9i-a80-mmc", > > > > This can be "allwinner,sun9i-a80-mmc-config-clk" > > *Must*, not can. :) Indeed, thanks for spotting this, Jagan. Also I just figured that we need to enable the parent clocks and resets of this clock itself. I hope we can do this unconditionally, even for the complex CCU, as enabling fixed-clocks should be covered by the clock framework already. Cheers, Andre.