On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 05:43:52PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 04:38:26PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > No, it also fails if there's already something with the same name in
> > debugfs which can happen as as a result of configuration.  This gets
> > confusing for users, they see the debugfs files they're expecting but
> > the contents don't match up at all.

> How can you allow a duplicate name for the other regmap stuff?  Will
> that not also cause a collision somewhere else?

No, the only place we actually use the names for anything is when
creating the debugfs.  Otherwise the driver using the regmap deals with
a pointer to the regmap which doesn't have any collision risk.

> Anyway, if this is that big of a problem, ok, but then your code will
> run differently if debugfs is enabled or not, which isn't ok.  Don't
> rely on debugfs to do your name filtering for you :)

I'd rather hope that the debugfs creation code runs differently
depending on if debugfs is enabled, perhaps that's just a strange foible
of mine. :)