From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm1-f65.google.com (mail-wm1-f65.google.com [209.85.128.65]) by mail.openembedded.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8A460402 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:17:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-wm1-f65.google.com with SMTP id d15so2589854wmb.3 for ; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:17:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=S99H7hi0/OJwgI5U92E59M1+vco6poAziOfCvRoJYe4=; b=sX75LDaDgZfayU6mEyzrp2bsMG4yBxw2zoRl7YvIfkmue55bKaPYT0OER9vfEAskUA 3YCmZMFtKziV30z81aU/URKe7fGNfXMLvYmQra8/qSUeYK5XqDzOLL3Moq5VwKyORqMf CqDU22PvXqgE5H6ehqkcbFshoPd8iwDyCS+kd6dlPuYKPnhETL31VJiE/u086vbYm30J 5eXaTY3MuwZ0shyAENl3yI2swYmbeX/PCjPFTbLtWUL6/aoxQ506dmD7Xkx0fVsBlCZ9 IcISaLH5J7dhPfP0gaPdkosQnCe6i0Pt6qI+NUtRY3Cq7+hK1R3Ra0WMTiKxGJsSPcPC CROw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id; bh=S99H7hi0/OJwgI5U92E59M1+vco6poAziOfCvRoJYe4=; b=oNQ5N+2iJ3Obc+5fsHTkKAdGLmP3klIC88+ktaQZlF2XvxtgEzcp2fPdFPXLYRProR qJ1rvKyT32afGEunHUcIcljncj1rgHYUArO5wysQG730B9ThXxBUWQY94KDygidu3wl3 re9UqOLHCitXUH/SpZz0OfhLPs81ORD/2B9ESyOPBPAmHJ06j0UBjj4JlJ9zagmAQajG L1v16ImT+H8+k1quY2MOSvg74jPH9KbvjSx0QnP/B9Bew7igBnHmBLWNpmnIu+cef+NM e9J7n2IKdfsI4N0PzZ5vEIcejcu9P4qINxQnfJnb4pLEyUnROFHBf+6iG64hHbnSr4V2 BFNw== X-Gm-Message-State: AJcUukeq5KQlKaTq+4MK4TiuBTWSe+olM2zc9lBowoG+Sun8rbR4VxdE q+bPvda7YkOYHc2Vo97sjnCas04D X-Google-Smtp-Source: ALg8bN62ylmC8h+RJnuFHlHyoCeATHtZhULBVM52kNt31RF12pxbyX7br+b++mFUFj7W7KNbYFtLzQ== X-Received: by 2002:a1c:7eca:: with SMTP id z193mr3198185wmc.5.1548260272353; Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:17:52 -0800 (PST) Received: from alexander-box.luxoft.com ([62.96.135.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j33sm161192189wre.91.2019.01.23.08.17.50 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 23 Jan 2019 08:17:51 -0800 (PST) From: Alexander Kanavin To: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 17:17:35 +0100 Message-Id: <20190123161744.45763-1-alex.kanavin@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 Subject: [PATCH 01/10] sstate.bbclass: make sure changes to SSTATE_SCAN_FILES are not ignored X-BeenThere: openembedded-core@lists.openembedded.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12 Precedence: list List-Id: Patches and discussions about the oe-core layer List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jan 2019 16:17:52 -0000 When changing the SSTATE_SCAN_FILES variable in a recipe it doesn't cause a rebuild, so if there's a sstate-cache available with "bad" sstate data in it that will still be used even though the recipe is updated to address this. [YOCTO #13144] Signed-off-by: Alexander Kanavin --- meta/classes/sstate.bbclass | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass index 2f0bbd2d7df..6f51d9c1879 100644 --- a/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass +++ b/meta/classes/sstate.bbclass @@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ SSTATE_ARCHS = " \ SSTATE_MANMACH ?= "${SSTATE_PKGARCH}" SSTATECREATEFUNCS = "sstate_hardcode_path" +SSTATECREATEFUNCS[vardeps] = "SSTATE_SCAN_FILES" SSTATEPOSTCREATEFUNCS = "" SSTATEPREINSTFUNCS = "" SSTATEPOSTUNPACKFUNCS = "sstate_hardcode_path_unpack" -- 2.17.1