From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 133C4C282C7 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:48:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D407520882 for ; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:48:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548762523; bh=YGtAW5dPNGmI4FMT2/U/RsvudpJXFcTUg4priwPfcko=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=KiUXeAu3DIVdsgYMuAi41ZbzCsrUo+qx0zafrUaA0oXAGrEvcRGVyJ3uLA1yIRWYa 5Ss69OQQq/Z502CLgG4xgqxiC8gyuVO/cGKIqp5/J8YEaWMjbgh7YZZRo5W1TzZhix ym7++IyVemEv1nEwCm3fYHyL4uSe9O/8L73fM1cE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731370AbfA2Lsl (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 06:48:41 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:39516 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731169AbfA2Lsi (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Jan 2019 06:48:38 -0500 Received: from localhost (5356596B.cm-6-7b.dynamic.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C4F442083B; Tue, 29 Jan 2019 11:48:36 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1548762517; bh=YGtAW5dPNGmI4FMT2/U/RsvudpJXFcTUg4priwPfcko=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=n+v1512EFG/I8QvWh5r76I3R8N4Tjewl/ZUNroxxQ6616twPH5izWSNkVpQav2qyh 367zjx/vONnsH6f22dh8P0IapviUSNMggRELYC+f187lItuA7Odwj5e7AHO9jE09CX Zj1sYOGOY5aXqkizZ5uSB1PT4RnusiTR9DTYpJVs= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Shilovsky , Ronnie Sahlberg , Steve French Subject: [PATCH 4.14 31/68] CIFS: Fix credits calculations for reads with errors Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2019 12:35:53 +0100 Message-Id: <20190129113134.197266701@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 In-Reply-To: <20190129113131.751891514@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190129113131.751891514@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Pavel Shilovsky commit 8004c78c68e894e4fd5ac3c22cc22eb7dc24cabc upstream. Currently we mark MID as malformed if we get an error from server in a read response. This leads to not properly processing credits in the readv callback. Fix this by marking such a response as normal received response and process it appropriately. Cc: Signed-off-by: Pavel Shilovsky Reviewed-by: Ronnie Sahlberg Signed-off-by: Steve French Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/cifs/cifssmb.c | 35 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------ 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) --- a/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c +++ b/fs/cifs/cifssmb.c @@ -1445,18 +1445,26 @@ cifs_discard_remaining_data(struct TCP_S } static int -cifs_readv_discard(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct mid_q_entry *mid) +__cifs_readv_discard(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct mid_q_entry *mid, + bool malformed) { int length; - struct cifs_readdata *rdata = mid->callback_data; length = cifs_discard_remaining_data(server); - dequeue_mid(mid, rdata->result); + dequeue_mid(mid, malformed); mid->resp_buf = server->smallbuf; server->smallbuf = NULL; return length; } +static int +cifs_readv_discard(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct mid_q_entry *mid) +{ + struct cifs_readdata *rdata = mid->callback_data; + + return __cifs_readv_discard(server, mid, rdata->result); +} + int cifs_readv_receive(struct TCP_Server_Info *server, struct mid_q_entry *mid) { @@ -1496,12 +1504,23 @@ cifs_readv_receive(struct TCP_Server_Inf return -1; } + /* set up first two iov for signature check and to get credits */ + rdata->iov[0].iov_base = buf; + rdata->iov[0].iov_len = 4; + rdata->iov[1].iov_base = buf + 4; + rdata->iov[1].iov_len = server->total_read - 4; + cifs_dbg(FYI, "0: iov_base=%p iov_len=%zu\n", + rdata->iov[0].iov_base, rdata->iov[0].iov_len); + cifs_dbg(FYI, "1: iov_base=%p iov_len=%zu\n", + rdata->iov[1].iov_base, rdata->iov[1].iov_len); + /* Was the SMB read successful? */ rdata->result = server->ops->map_error(buf, false); if (rdata->result != 0) { cifs_dbg(FYI, "%s: server returned error %d\n", __func__, rdata->result); - return cifs_readv_discard(server, mid); + /* normal error on read response */ + return __cifs_readv_discard(server, mid, false); } /* Is there enough to get to the rest of the READ_RSP header? */ @@ -1544,14 +1563,6 @@ cifs_readv_receive(struct TCP_Server_Inf server->total_read += length; } - /* set up first iov for signature check */ - rdata->iov[0].iov_base = buf; - rdata->iov[0].iov_len = 4; - rdata->iov[1].iov_base = buf + 4; - rdata->iov[1].iov_len = server->total_read - 4; - cifs_dbg(FYI, "0: iov_base=%p iov_len=%u\n", - rdata->iov[0].iov_base, server->total_read); - /* how much data is in the response? */ data_len = server->ops->read_data_length(buf); if (data_offset + data_len > buflen) {