From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48448C282D9 for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 00:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1943620B1F for ; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 00:08:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="E/e4G1Gu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728507AbfBAAIW (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 19:08:22 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:36232 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726817AbfBAAIW (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 Jan 2019 19:08:22 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2BCC5900604F5F4DB2DDD4A2.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2bcc:5900:604f:5f4d:b2dd:d4a2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 035A41EC056D; Fri, 1 Feb 2019 01:08:20 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1548979700; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=wcLuJ5V51PVE0zKzUOX1MtOZiwFVSnXFC3mEr9uPUuE=; b=E/e4G1Gu3uYJzE1+hYaUic0nJ8qQSKAbyHPaKzGpbcRJEfLIdvvwjvRuhK6A5if0R1ZV+H xCwh6IS5Fhejsck0mFDZ5jWttUTAqiPjY4RPhooUvPD1vkhXw7tk8wSX732icDg3J3Vpac aHb9W97uZCeAupSpClOU1AiNsJTnEVo= Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 01:08:12 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Nadav Amit Cc: Rick Edgecombe , Andy Lutomirski , Ingo Molnar , LKML , X86 ML , "H. Peter Anvin" , Thomas Gleixner , Dave Hansen , Peter Zijlstra , Damian Tometzki , linux-integrity , LSM List , Andrew Morton , Kernel Hardening , Linux-MM , Will Deacon , Ard Biesheuvel , Kristen Carlson Accardi , "Dock, Deneen T" , Kees Cook , Dave Hansen Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 03/20] x86/mm: temporary mm struct Message-ID: <20190201000812.GP6749@zn.tnic> References: <20190129003422.9328-1-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20190129003422.9328-4-rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com> <20190131112948.GE6749@zn.tnic> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 10:19:54PM +0000, Nadav Amit wrote: > Meta-question: could you please review the entire patch-set? This is > actually v9 of this particular patch - it was part of a separate patch-set > before. I don’t think that the patch has changed since (the real) v1. > > These sporadic comments after each version really makes it hard to get this > work completed. Sorry but where I am the day has only 24 hours and this patchset is not the only one in my overflowing mbox. If my sporadic comments are making it hard to finish your work, I better not interfere then. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. Good mailing practices for 400: avoid top-posting and trim the reply.