From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Abel Vesa Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2019 17:59:46 +0000 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH v4 00/20] mx6sabre: Add DM and SPL FIT support In-Reply-To: References: <1549039198-16674-1-git-send-email-abel.vesa@nxp.com> Message-ID: <20190201175946.mk3jsg34tilrm7ps@fsr-ub1664-175> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On 19-02-01 15:13:32, Fabio Estevam wrote: > Hi Abel, > > On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Abel Vesa wrote: > > > > The third version is here: > > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flists.denx.de%2Fpipermail%2Fu-boot%2F2019-January%2F356903.html&data=02%7C01%7Cabel.vesa%40nxp.com%7Cc7db2be273394c06098308d688689e41%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0%7C636846380248922351&sdata=fhDqNxkE1dq0fGNroGRR%2F0OkmBPRlVBqCefS6GM8kns%3D&reserved=0 > > > > So, this time I hope I got it right. Before, I was stupidly trying > > to put a fit in another fit without a really good reason. To my > > excuse, that was working even with the spl_image->os set to 0, > > bug which I (hope) I fixed in the first patch (a new one) > > of this series. > > Thanks for your work on this! > > Just to confirm: with this series all sabresd variants (imx6q, imx6dl, > imx6qp) boot with the same binary, right? > That is correct. For mx6sabresd_defconfig, all imx6q_sabresd, imx6qp_sabresd and imx6dl_sabresd have been tested with the same binary. And I've tested exactly the same the mx6sabreauto_defconfig with all three SoC combinations. > Is there anything known to be not working that used to work before due > to missing driver model conversion? > I don't know about anything that might not work. As specified in the cover letter I had to get rid (disable) of EFI, EXT and DOS support in SPL. > Is Ethernet functional? I haven't tested the ethernet on all of them, just one of each (sabresd/sabreauto). I'll test them all when I get back at the office tomorrow. > > Thanks