From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED, USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EE8AC282C4 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 07:53:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B7F1320821 for ; Mon, 4 Feb 2019 07:53:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="F7FJtn+R" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726023AbfBDHxh (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 02:53:37 -0500 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.133]:46784 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725902AbfBDHxg (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Feb 2019 02:53:36 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version :References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=wuTxDgNOrnJkjcWUNtJcSHc0xyjiEM2AU8eR0wY5bcw=; b=F7FJtn+RCAPDwLzc/NpaE3drQ OX7NGMBrGhee/7SVsVJoM1S/cqTs/Z5KLm8rSNuom64wBEwpOOsIfT01YvArLCV67cwq+NO1sJLrm px1tb6LKRwUEkAuLtBgoafXZ/eKEZ6x4sO2hRvBJg8mFm4e1UNCffM5iQCjsIs06vrN2kI17THcGp LOmYKbyhs9rSxrdkgyHbLiVJrTkk7CdecyTIJfHLmFyqzjZe2M+DkGBpvfRYWHbbXW3p+vgXs2CKf f91/9HGG5oT3HBfHGZjU9U2u5dnq+vuDvOc404CE7dkxkpmHQm54oPIUwS9x05lrrZt6bDIVu/GtU lWNgjEDUw==; Received: from hch by bombadil.infradead.org with local (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1gqZ4S-0001t5-B2; Mon, 04 Feb 2019 07:53:36 +0000 Date: Sun, 3 Feb 2019 23:53:36 -0800 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Chuck Lever Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Linux NFS Mailing List , simo@redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 04/10] SUNRPC: Add common byte-swapped RPC header constants Message-ID: <20190204075336.GA28337@infradead.org> References: <20190201195538.11389.96106.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <20190201195747.11389.75164.stgit@manet.1015granger.net> <20190202170258.GA14074@infradead.org> <52468C38-9E9C-49A7-B44B-2BE302A33145@oracle.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <52468C38-9E9C-49A7-B44B-2BE302A33145@oracle.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-SRS-Rewrite: SMTP reverse-path rewritten from by bombadil.infradead.org. See http://www.infradead.org/rpr.html Sender: linux-nfs-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org On Sat, Feb 02, 2019 at 05:49:35PM -0500, Chuck Lever wrote: > >> Byte-swapping causes a CPU pipeline bubble on some processors. When > >> a decoder is comparing an on-the-wire value for equality, byte- > >> swapping can be avoided by comparing it directly to a pre-byte- > >> swapped constant value. > > > > Which ones? > > I assume you mean on which processors have I observed CPU cycle > spikes around bswap instructions. Yes. > I've seen this behavior only > on Intel processors of various families. Interesting. In general we should not do separate byte swap instructions on x86, as MOVBE can be used to do a load or store with an included byteswap, and I thought the whole point for that was that they could be handled in the same cycle. In fact https://www.agner.org/optimize/instruction_tables.pdf says that movbe is generally a single cycle instruction. > Would you prefer a different justification for this clean-up? I don't really care about the cleanup, it is just that the explanation goes against conventional wisdom, which is why I was a little surpised. And that is not just the cycles, but also as Trond pointed out that the Linux byte swapping macro on constants should usually be optimized away at compile time anyway.