From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A961C169C4 for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0623B2229F for ; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:18:50 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388123AbfBKTSs (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:18:48 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:49276 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728404AbfBKTSr (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:18:47 -0500 Received: from akpm3.svl.corp.google.com (unknown [104.133.8.65]) by mail.linuxfoundation.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 21496D6DD; Mon, 11 Feb 2019 19:18:47 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2019 11:18:45 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Johannes Weiner Cc: Roman Gushchin , linux-mm@kvack.org, Matthew Wilcox , Michal Hocko , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com, Roman Gushchin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] vmalloc enhancements Message-Id: <20190211111845.fcc4210d35020a721149da74@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <20190211190822.GA14443@cmpxchg.org> References: <20181219173751.28056-1-guro@fb.com> <20190211190822.GA14443@cmpxchg.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.6.0 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 11 Feb 2019 14:08:22 -0500 Johannes Weiner wrote: > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 09:37:48AM -0800, Roman Gushchin wrote: > > The patchset contains few changes to the vmalloc code, which are > > leading to some performance gains and code simplification. > > > > Also, it exports a number of pages, used by vmalloc(), > > in /proc/meminfo. > > These slipped through the cracks. +CC Andrew directly. > Andrew, if it's not too late yet, could you consider them for 5.1? > There's been some activity in vmalloc.c lately and these have bitrotted. They'll need a redo, please.