All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh+dt@kernel.org>,
	Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr>,
	Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>,
	Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Prateek Patel <prpatel@nvidia.com>,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] of: fix kmemleak crash caused by imbalance in early memory reservation
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:12:37 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190213121237.b6df41e4fb6317e58c0716a3@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190213181921.GB15270@rapoport-lnx>

On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 20:19:22 +0200 Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com> wrote:

> 
> Marc Gonzalez reported the following kmemleak crash:
> 
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffc021e00000
> Mem abort info:
>   ESR = 0x96000006
>   Exception class = DABT (current EL), IL = 32 bits
>   SET = 0, FnV = 0
>   EA = 0, S1PTW = 0
> Data abort info:
>   ISV = 0, ISS = 0x00000006
>   CM = 0, WnR = 0
> swapper pgtable: 4k pages, 39-bit VAs, pgdp = (____ptrval____)
> [ffffffc021e00000] pgd=000000017e3ba803, pud=000000017e3ba803,
> pmd=0000000000000000
> Internal error: Oops: 96000006 [#1] PREEMPT SMP
> Modules linked in:
> CPU: 6 PID: 523 Comm: kmemleak Tainted: G S      W         5.0.0-rc1 #13
> Hardware name: Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. MSM8998 v1 MTP (DT)
> pstate: 80000085 (Nzcv daIf -PAN -UAO)
> pc : scan_block+0x70/0x190
> lr : scan_block+0x6c/0x190
> sp : ffffff8012e8bd20
> x29: ffffff8012e8bd20 x28: ffffffc0fdbaf018
> x27: ffffffc022000000 x26: 0000000000000080
> x25: ffffff8011aadf70 x24: ffffffc0f8cc8000
> x23: ffffff8010dc8000 x22: ffffff8010dc8830
> x21: ffffffc021e00ff9 x20: ffffffc0f8cc8050
> x19: ffffffc021e00000 x18: 0000000000002409
> x17: 0000000000000200 x16: 0000000000000000
> x15: ffffff8010e14dd8 x14: 0000000000002406
> x13: 000000004c4dd0c6 x12: ffffffc0f77dad58
> x11: 0000000000000001 x10: ffffff8010d9e688
> x9 : ffffff8010d9f000 x8 : ffffff8010d9e688
> x7 : 0000000000000002 x6 : 0000000000000000
> x5 : ffffff8011511c20 x4 : 00000000000026d1
> x3 : ffffff8010e14d88 x2 : 5b36396f4e7d4000
> x1 : 0000000000208040 x0 : 0000000000000000
> Process kmemleak (pid: 523, stack limit = 0x(____ptrval____))
> Call trace:
>  scan_block+0x70/0x190
>  scan_gray_list+0x108/0x1c0
>  kmemleak_scan+0x33c/0x7c0
>  kmemleak_scan_thread+0x98/0xf0
>  kthread+0x11c/0x120
>  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x1c
> Code: f9000fb4 d503201f 97ffffd2 35000580 (f9400260)
> ---[ end trace 176d6ed9d86a0c33 ]---
> note: kmemleak[523] exited with preempt_count 2
> 
> The crash happens when a no-map area is allocated in
> early_init_dt_alloc_reserved_memory_arch(). The allocated region is
> registered with kmemleak, but it is then removed from memblock using
> memblock_remove() that is not kmemleak-aware.
> 
> Replacing memblock_phys_alloc_range() with memblock_find_in_range() makes
> sure that the allocated memory is not added to kmemleak and then
> memblock_remove()'ing this memory is safe.
> 
> As a bonus, since memblock_find_in_range() ensures the allocation in the
> specified range, the bounds check can be removed.

hm, why is this against -mm rather than against mainline?

Do the OF maintainers intend to merge the fix?

Thanks.

  reply	other threads:[~2019-02-13 20:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-13 18:19 Mike Rapoport
2019-02-13 18:19 ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-13 20:12 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-02-13 21:13   ` Mike Rapoport
2019-02-13 21:47     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190213121237.b6df41e4fb6317e58c0716a3@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=frowand.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
    --cc=marc.w.gonzalez@free.fr \
    --cc=prpatel@nvidia.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH v3] of: fix kmemleak crash caused by imbalance in early memory reservation' \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.