All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>,
	NetFilter <netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Alin Nastac <alin.nastac@gmail.com>,
	Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>,
	David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: linux-next: build failure after merge of the netfilter-next tree
Date: Wed, 13 Feb 2019 16:54:15 +1100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190213165415.5a992838@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3240 bytes --]

Hi all,

After merging the netfilter-next tree, today's linux-next build (powerpc
allyesconfig) failed like this:

ld: net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.o:(.opd+0x78): multiple definition of `nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.opd+0x78): first defined here
ld: net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv4.o: in function `.nf_reject_verify_csum':
(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): multiple definition of `.nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): first defined here
ld: net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_reject_ipv4.o:(.opd+0x48): multiple definition of `nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.opd+0x78): first defined here
ld: net/ipv4/netfilter/nft_reject_ipv4.o: in function `.nf_reject_verify_csum':
(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): multiple definition of `.nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): first defined here
ld: net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_REJECT.o:(.opd+0x60): multiple definition of `nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.opd+0x78): first defined here
ld: net/ipv4/netfilter/ipt_REJECT.o: in function `.nf_reject_verify_csum':
(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): multiple definition of `.nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): first defined here
ld: net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.o:(.opd+0x78): multiple definition of `nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.opd+0x78): first defined here
ld: net/ipv6/netfilter/nf_reject_ipv6.o: in function `.nf_reject_verify_csum':
(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): multiple definition of `.nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): first defined here
ld: net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_reject_ipv6.o:(.opd+0x48): multiple definition of `nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.opd+0x78): first defined here
ld: net/ipv6/netfilter/nft_reject_ipv6.o: in function `.nf_reject_verify_csum':
(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): multiple definition of `.nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): first defined here
ld: net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_REJECT.o:(.opd+0x60): multiple definition of `nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.opd+0x78): first defined here
ld: net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_REJECT.o: in function `.nf_reject_verify_csum':
(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): multiple definition of `.nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): first defined here
ld: net/bridge/netfilter/nft_reject_bridge.o:(.opd+0x108): multiple definition of `nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.opd+0x78): first defined here
ld: net/bridge/netfilter/nft_reject_bridge.o: in function `.nf_reject_verify_csum':
(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): multiple definition of `.nf_reject_verify_csum'; net/netfilter/nft_reject_inet.o:(.text.nf_reject_verify_csum+0x0): first defined here

Caused by commit

  bfcf40da7559 ("netfilter: reject: skip csum verification for protocols that don't support it")

I have reverted that commit for today.



-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2019-02-13  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-13  5:54 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-07-08  3:39 linux-next: build failure after merge of the netfilter-next tree Stephen Rothwell
2019-07-09  3:59 ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-20 13:47 Stephen Rothwell
2019-06-20 13:57 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-06-20 14:16   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-12  6:37 Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-12  8:15 ` Florian Westphal
2019-04-13  4:05   ` Stephen Rothwell
2019-04-12 16:36 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2019-01-20 23:36 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-15 23:41 Stephen Rothwell
2018-10-16  8:02 ` Pablo Neira Ayuso
2018-07-18  1:50 Stephen Rothwell
2016-08-18  1:56 Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190213165415.5a992838@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=alin.nastac@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=fw@strlen.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pablo@netfilter.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.