From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: virtio-comment-return-622-cohuck=redhat.com@lists.oasis-open.org Sender: List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: Received: from lists.oasis-open.org (oasis.ws5.connectedcommunity.org [10.110.1.242]) by lists.oasis-open.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F0F9860B3 for ; Fri, 15 Feb 2019 12:51:43 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 15 Feb 2019 13:51:34 +0100 From: Halil Pasic In-Reply-To: <20190214115807.2bab4efb.cohuck@redhat.com> References: <20190111114200.10026-1-dgilbert@redhat.com> <20190111114200.10026-2-dgilbert@redhat.com> <20190111131540.12a8abca.cohuck@redhat.com> <20190111122654.GE2738@work-vm> <20190115111038.6769d292.cohuck@redhat.com> <20190115112303.GB2135@work-vm> <20190116115638.152d6797.cohuck@redhat.com> <20190116200625.GG2351@work-vm> <20190211225225.7c39154d.cohuck@redhat.com> <20190213183755.GF2601@work-vm> <20190214115807.2bab4efb.cohuck@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <20190215135134.1945200c@oc2783563651> Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH 1/3] shared memory: Define shared memory regions To: Cornelia Huck Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, stefanha@redhat.com List-ID: On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:58:07 +0100 Cornelia Huck wrote: > Tags: inv, virtio > From: Cornelia Huck > To: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" > Cc: virtio-comment@lists.oasis-open.org, stefanha@redhat.com, Halil Pasic > Subject: Re: [virtio-comment] [PATCH 1/3] shared memory: Define shared memory regions > Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2019 11:58:07 +0100 > Sender: > Organization: Red Hat GmbH > > On Wed, 13 Feb 2019 18:37:56 +0000 > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote: > > > * Cornelia Huck (cohuck@redhat.com) wrote: > > > On Wed, 16 Jan 2019 20:06:25 +0000 > > > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" wrote: > > > > > > > So these are all moving this 1/3 forward - has anyone got comments on > > > > the transport specific implementations? > > > > > > No comment on pci or mmio, but I've hacked something together for ccw. > > > Basically, one sense-type ccw for discovery and a control-type ccw for > > > activation of the regions (no idea if we really need the latter), both > > > available with ccw revision 3. > > > > > > No idea whether this will work this way, though... > > > > That sounds (from a shm perspective) reasonable; can I ask why the > > 'activate' is needed? > > The activate interface is actually what I'm most unsure about; maybe > Halil can chime in. Sorry, I unfortunately kept deferring looking into this. Will have to do some more thinking. I promise to give you my feedback by Monday end of day if not sooner. Does that work with you? Regards, Halil This publicly archived list offers a means to provide input to the OASIS Virtual I/O Device (VIRTIO) TC. In order to verify user consent to the Feedback License terms and to minimize spam in the list archive, subscription is required before posting. Subscribe: virtio-comment-subscribe@lists.oasis-open.org Unsubscribe: virtio-comment-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org List help: virtio-comment-help@lists.oasis-open.org List archive: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/virtio-comment/ Feedback License: https://www.oasis-open.org/who/ipr/feedback_license.pdf List Guidelines: https://www.oasis-open.org/policies-guidelines/mailing-lists Committee: https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/virtio/ Join OASIS: https://www.oasis-open.org/join/