From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5C176C43381 for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:03:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B5892175B for ; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:03:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550480596; bh=hI8OJOUsEhFtBEQI8UfTQKYqQ2Nvs6lsAYQd2YliCvo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=19odLooG0ZQbpdpRSiLc9ks++yOpp5Tom16qJGycBA2GBFYJhB0ntt11568ijjkwr wsn1Hpduw7MVsFzsDfpfSnR6nbmrQnfY8YzIT85izrtHyAWH+wxG/ZHBZOqHVBEQMP 4he91wK2TTuwZ48J1jldqLKkVul82921K2KSYEWM= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729348AbfBRJDN (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 04:03:13 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:53966 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727423AbfBRJDN (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Feb 2019 04:03:13 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51037AECF; Mon, 18 Feb 2019 09:03:12 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:03:10 +0100 From: Michal Hocko To: Rong Chen Cc: Oscar Salvador , Andrew Morton , Linux Memory Management List , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, LKP Subject: Re: [LKP] efad4e475c [ 40.308255] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI Message-ID: <20190218090310.GE4525@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <20190218052823.GH29177@shao2-debian> <20190218070844.GC4525@dhcp22.suse.cz> <79a3d305-1d96-3938-dc14-617a9e475648@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <79a3d305-1d96-3938-dc14-617a9e475648@intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 18-02-19 16:47:26, Rong Chen wrote: > > On 2/18/19 3:08 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 18-02-19 13:28:23, kernel test robot wrote: [...] > > > [ 40.305212] PGD 0 P4D 0 > > > [ 40.308255] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI > > > [ 40.313055] CPU: 1 PID: 239 Comm: udevd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4-00149-gefad4e4 #1 > > > [ 40.321348] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 > > > [ 40.330813] RIP: 0010:page_mapping+0x12/0x80 > > > [ 40.335709] Code: 5d c3 48 89 df e8 0e ad 02 00 85 c0 75 da 89 e8 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 53 48 89 fb 48 8b 43 08 48 8d 50 ff a8 01 48 0f 45 da <48> 8b 53 08 48 8d 42 ff 83 e2 01 48 0f 44 c3 48 83 38 ff 74 2f 48 > > > [ 40.356704] RSP: 0018:ffff88801fa87cd8 EFLAGS: 00010202 > > > [ 40.362714] RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: fffffffffffffffe RCX: 000000000000000a > > > [ 40.370798] RDX: fffffffffffffffe RSI: ffffffff820b9a20 RDI: ffff88801e5c0000 > > > [ 40.378830] RBP: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R08: ffff88801e8bb000 R09: 0000000001b64d13 > > > [ 40.386902] R10: ffff88801fa87cf8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff88801e640000 > > > [ 40.395033] R13: ffffffff820b9a20 R14: ffff88801f145258 R15: 0000000000000001 > > > [ 40.403138] FS: 00007fb2079817c0(0000) GS:ffff88801dd00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > [ 40.412243] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > > [ 40.418846] CR2: 0000000000000006 CR3: 000000001fa82000 CR4: 00000000000006a0 > > > [ 40.426951] Call Trace: > > > [ 40.429843] __dump_page+0x14/0x2c0 > > > [ 40.433947] is_mem_section_removable+0x24c/0x2c0 > > This looks like we are stumbling over an unitialized struct page again. > > Something this patch should prevent from. Could you try to apply [1] > > which will make __dump_page more robust so that we do not blow up there > > and give some more details in return. > > > Hi Hocko, > > I have applied [1] and attached the dmesg file. Thanks so the log confirms that this is really an unitialized struct page [ 12.228622] raw: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff [ 12.231474] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p)) [ 12.232135] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 12.232649] kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1020! So now, we have to find out what has been left behind. Please see my other email. Also could you give me faddr2line of the is_mem_section_removable offset please? I assume it is is_pageblock_removable_nolock: if (!node_online(page_to_nid(page))) return false; -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============8190845448901100497==" MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Michal Hocko To: lkp@lists.01.org Subject: Re: efad4e475c [ 40.308255] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2019 10:03:10 +0100 Message-ID: <20190218090310.GE4525@dhcp22.suse.cz> In-Reply-To: <79a3d305-1d96-3938-dc14-617a9e475648@intel.com> List-Id: --===============8190845448901100497== Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon 18-02-19 16:47:26, Rong Chen wrote: > = > On 2/18/19 3:08 PM, Michal Hocko wrote: > > On Mon 18-02-19 13:28:23, kernel test robot wrote: [...] > > > [ 40.305212] PGD 0 P4D 0 > > > [ 40.308255] Oops: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP PTI > > > [ 40.313055] CPU: 1 PID: 239 Comm: udevd Not tainted 5.0.0-rc4-0014= 9-gefad4e4 #1 > > > [ 40.321348] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996),= BIOS 1.10.2-1 04/01/2014 > > > [ 40.330813] RIP: 0010:page_mapping+0x12/0x80 > > > [ 40.335709] Code: 5d c3 48 89 df e8 0e ad 02 00 85 c0 75 da 89 e8 = 5b 5d c3 0f 1f 44 00 00 53 48 89 fb 48 8b 43 08 48 8d 50 ff a8 01 48 0f 45 = da <48> 8b 53 08 48 8d 42 ff 83 e2 01 48 0f 44 c3 48 83 38 ff 74 2f 48 > > > [ 40.356704] RSP: 0018:ffff88801fa87cd8 EFLAGS: 00010202 > > > [ 40.362714] RAX: ffffffffffffffff RBX: fffffffffffffffe RCX: 00000= 0000000000a > > > [ 40.370798] RDX: fffffffffffffffe RSI: ffffffff820b9a20 RDI: ffff8= 8801e5c0000 > > > [ 40.378830] RBP: 6db6db6db6db6db7 R08: ffff88801e8bb000 R09: 00000= 00001b64d13 > > > [ 40.386902] R10: ffff88801fa87cf8 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffff8= 8801e640000 > > > [ 40.395033] R13: ffffffff820b9a20 R14: ffff88801f145258 R15: 00000= 00000000001 > > > [ 40.403138] FS: 00007fb2079817c0(0000) GS:ffff88801dd00000(0000) = knlGS:0000000000000000 > > > [ 40.412243] CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 > > > [ 40.418846] CR2: 0000000000000006 CR3: 000000001fa82000 CR4: 00000= 000000006a0 > > > [ 40.426951] Call Trace: > > > [ 40.429843] __dump_page+0x14/0x2c0 > > > [ 40.433947] is_mem_section_removable+0x24c/0x2c0 > > This looks like we are stumbling over an unitialized struct page again. > > Something this patch should prevent from. Could you try to apply [1] > > which will make __dump_page more robust so that we do not blow up there > > and give some more details in return. > = > = > Hi Hocko, > = > I have applied [1] and attached the dmesg file. Thanks so the log confirms that this is really an unitialized struct page [ 12.228622] raw: ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff ffffffffffffffff [ 12.231474] page dumped because: VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(PagePoisoned(p)) [ 12.232135] ------------[ cut here ]------------ [ 12.232649] kernel BUG at include/linux/mm.h:1020! So now, we have to find out what has been left behind. Please see my other email. Also could you give me faddr2line of the is_mem_section_removable offset please? I assume it is = is_pageblock_removable_nolock: if (!node_online(page_to_nid(page))) return false; -- = Michal Hocko SUSE Labs --===============8190845448901100497==--