From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:44527) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwP1s-0000Sh-1Z for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:23:04 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwP1r-0004vX-Ay for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:23:04 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33208) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gwP1r-0004uV-3l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 05:23:03 -0500 Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2019 10:22:53 +0000 From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" Message-ID: <20190220102252.GB2608@work-vm> References: <1550611400-13703-1-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1550611400-13703-1-git-send-email-kwankhede@nvidia.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/5] Add migration support for VFIO device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kirti Wankhede Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com, cjia@nvidia.com, kevin.tian@intel.com, ziye.yang@intel.com, changpeng.liu@intel.com, yi.l.liu@intel.com, mlevitsk@redhat.com, eskultet@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com, jonathan.davies@nutanix.com, eauger@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, pasic@linux.ibm.com, felipe@nutanix.com, Zhengxiao.zx@alibaba-inc.com, shuangtai.tst@alibaba-inc.com, Ken.Xue@amd.com, zhi.a.wang@intel.com, yan.y.zhao@intel.com, yulei.zhang@intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org * Kirti Wankhede (kwankhede@nvidia.com) wrote: > Add migration support for VFIO device Hi Kirti, Can you explain how this compares and works with Yan Zhao's set? These look like two incompatible solutions to me - if that's the case we need to take a step back and figure out how to combine them into one. Dave -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK