From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88FF5C43381 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:17:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590F320651 for ; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:17:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550956672; bh=I6uvV3ywAOTTE1xa/aRXlFfj3tTmsO3hWUuav/GUIgA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:List-ID:From; b=GYD4Xp+S/orgxzlhYVxZxKEZiOvhvFV1AkzWFgs8+7uqdwmHgsuO4DBC5GW2TWk1r /OHFAUXmivnYYaDTB92FCUT6pfET0rDIUSJ6Ls5iWPJZvp6Xn5ILUTMC9qrE9aoSFC hMNpuS8TDQjRhfQNibVfyEjL+33dzt7pJ463pVUc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729648AbfBWVKA (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 16:10:00 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45726 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728659AbfBWVJz (ORCPT ); Sat, 23 Feb 2019 16:09:55 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EE79120855; Sat, 23 Feb 2019 21:09:52 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1550956193; bh=I6uvV3ywAOTTE1xa/aRXlFfj3tTmsO3hWUuav/GUIgA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=OK8vpE7Rg++2zFWgKffkOrHX1xn8UTDypuIynnDPIlV8XSgf5iTWZzRbS/oggYsym lLbF1kaX2+RANBxBQmKCbrCCzCb1nqKitoN3Cb0n3Yko41TrE0RZNXHllOa0GRuDB+ QdYpZgXPJXKH3/hxjGYY4tjvJA0vjNxybJR5dBoo= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Su Yanjun , Steffen Klassert , Sasha Levin , netdev@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.9 01/32] vti4: Fix a ipip packet processing bug in 'IPCOMP' virtual tunnel Date: Sat, 23 Feb 2019 16:09:20 -0500 Message-Id: <20190223210951.202268-1-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Su Yanjun [ Upstream commit dd9ee3444014e8f28c0eefc9fffc9ac9c5248c12 ] Recently we run a network test over ipcomp virtual tunnel.We find that if a ipv4 packet needs fragment, then the peer can't receive it. We deep into the code and find that when packet need fragment the smaller fragment will be encapsulated by ipip not ipcomp. So when the ipip packet goes into xfrm, it's skb->dev is not properly set. The ipv4 reassembly code always set skb'dev to the last fragment's dev. After ipv4 defrag processing, when the kernel rp_filter parameter is set, the skb will be drop by -EXDEV error. This patch adds compatible support for the ipip process in ipcomp virtual tunnel. Signed-off-by: Su Yanjun Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/ipv4/ip_vti.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 50 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c index cbff0d6ff1ac8..270e79f4d40e6 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c +++ b/net/ipv4/ip_vti.c @@ -74,6 +74,33 @@ static int vti_input(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, return 0; } +static int vti_input_ipip(struct sk_buff *skb, int nexthdr, __be32 spi, + int encap_type) +{ + struct ip_tunnel *tunnel; + const struct iphdr *iph = ip_hdr(skb); + struct net *net = dev_net(skb->dev); + struct ip_tunnel_net *itn = net_generic(net, vti_net_id); + + tunnel = ip_tunnel_lookup(itn, skb->dev->ifindex, TUNNEL_NO_KEY, + iph->saddr, iph->daddr, 0); + if (tunnel) { + if (!xfrm4_policy_check(NULL, XFRM_POLICY_IN, skb)) + goto drop; + + XFRM_TUNNEL_SKB_CB(skb)->tunnel.ip4 = tunnel; + + skb->dev = tunnel->dev; + + return xfrm_input(skb, nexthdr, spi, encap_type); + } + + return -EINVAL; +drop: + kfree_skb(skb); + return 0; +} + static int vti_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) { XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->family = AF_INET; @@ -82,6 +109,14 @@ static int vti_rcv(struct sk_buff *skb) return vti_input(skb, ip_hdr(skb)->protocol, 0, 0); } +static int vti_rcv_ipip(struct sk_buff *skb) +{ + XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->family = AF_INET; + XFRM_SPI_SKB_CB(skb)->daddroff = offsetof(struct iphdr, daddr); + + return vti_input_ipip(skb, ip_hdr(skb)->protocol, ip_hdr(skb)->saddr, 0); +} + static int vti_rcv_cb(struct sk_buff *skb, int err) { unsigned short family; @@ -439,6 +474,12 @@ static struct xfrm4_protocol vti_ipcomp4_protocol __read_mostly = { .priority = 100, }; +static struct xfrm_tunnel ipip_handler __read_mostly = { + .handler = vti_rcv_ipip, + .err_handler = vti4_err, + .priority = 0, +}; + static int __net_init vti_init_net(struct net *net) { int err; @@ -622,6 +663,13 @@ static int __init vti_init(void) if (err < 0) goto xfrm_proto_comp_failed; + msg = "ipip tunnel"; + err = xfrm4_tunnel_register(&ipip_handler, AF_INET); + if (err < 0) { + pr_info("%s: cant't register tunnel\n",__func__); + goto xfrm_tunnel_failed; + } + msg = "netlink interface"; err = rtnl_link_register(&vti_link_ops); if (err < 0) @@ -631,6 +679,8 @@ static int __init vti_init(void) rtnl_link_failed: xfrm4_protocol_deregister(&vti_ipcomp4_protocol, IPPROTO_COMP); +xfrm_tunnel_failed: + xfrm4_tunnel_deregister(&ipip_handler, AF_INET); xfrm_proto_comp_failed: xfrm4_protocol_deregister(&vti_ah4_protocol, IPPROTO_AH); xfrm_proto_ah_failed: -- 2.19.1