From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F9EC43381 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE962084D for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:47:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="g9mwJwMQ" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726767AbfBXWrg (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:47:36 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:48347 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725991AbfBXWrg (ORCPT ); Sun, 24 Feb 2019 17:47:36 -0500 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4470Zr5bH8z9s9y; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:47:32 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1551048452; bh=jipf+2Op/SRk48bH6yU7znHexb6tu97H3EnSph3rg2k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=g9mwJwMQ88r0F9YZgj95QiHcVf91QyanWjjl1stmIWUqrSe6aCyNz18LB0PRx9wcc IfBlkWIaD48RoK9ZW2aB/Lpi8Ev6lp08IkSnVeQm24PkJueHT+U6oOj7cmjJelJFV9 xZWQ6riXVM0ear3y7XIiJ13G1kQf2e3TtixByIUz7p35BRb9Iew/W34IlwpHmTte6a qj9R8+1aCEUMj0PxjbnJYgnfh8ucPgQmzhE6YSBBmcoddrZ2/Q2h9ewcEq11gZ2/Lz NMiWJSCPA5x7duEluWs+9WeF7DWuOLWH6xF8TC3NwKlmaxym/h7AVt875Y1GYbQ9ve ELUJdgwVkSBVw== Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:47:25 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Michael Ellerman Cc: PowerPC , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the powerpc tree Message-ID: <20190225094659.741bf42f@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <8736odl846.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> References: <20190224010511.74f25272@canb.auug.org.au> <8736odl846.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/==0L43=u6mND1Rkb1uxqnn9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/==0L43=u6mND1Rkb1uxqnn9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:48:57 +1100 Michael Ellerman wr= ote: > > But do they need SOBs? I think so, since they modify the code .. > The DCO says: >=20 > By making a contribution to this project, I certify that: >=20 > (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I > have the right to submit it under the open source license > indicated in the file; or >=20 > (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best > of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source > license and I have the right under that license to submit that > work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part > by me, under the same open source license (unless I am > permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated > in the file; or >=20 > (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other > person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified > it. >=20 > (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution > are public and that a record of the contribution (including a= ll > personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off)= is > maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent w= ith > this project or the open source license(s) involved. >=20 >=20 > Only d) really applies to a revert, and as the maintainer I feel like d) > is kind of implied. I read this as (a || b || c) && d. And if there is no SOB, then none of the above is certified. > Anyway I'll try and remember to do it in future if that's The Rule ;) Its just as effective as the rest of our rules ... i.e. a strong suggestion :-) Thanks --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/==0L43=u6mND1Rkb1uxqnn9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAlxzHv0ACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gz4KAf/YaVU9s53s+KgK+SNwYdSYd42mRJmfXVyrrUb0M6tubHkFyFsMmrI4apo lSaMmDwtrlOMf0Q8zm34TLUpyGtN0qGlhIlWgQJJSycLHZdh8BTkmzpyM5F9Byoa Yjiqx5eHBl1Bzd4K6BlJp0LdQG1FIuJcYKPD9iJ/mmqYhOLpEjs5KGiVmwQeML7g nzdG+lnBTlxdV/ja2VYqxtNK7Elb6PP6RpBSgqvWbPM1bIn95Ajk3HBJ93W9qvVK ykYz515cx8NvKj+OeKdnRX1uUDrjdU+vO06xFNL15/2ta5isXrdfbNiejglSChYh ZjfEz58DI2UdEoFIs8pqO7nCb9m3GA== =Vw1t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/==0L43=u6mND1Rkb1uxqnn9-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50355C43381 for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:49:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 81C492084D for ; Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:49:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="g9mwJwMQ" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 81C492084D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4470cd6xrFzDqS1 for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:49:05 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from ozlabs.org (bilbo.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::2]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4470Zs0mNTzDqKK for ; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:47:33 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; secure) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="g9mwJwMQ"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4470Zr5bH8z9s9y; Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:47:32 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1551048452; bh=jipf+2Op/SRk48bH6yU7znHexb6tu97H3EnSph3rg2k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=g9mwJwMQ88r0F9YZgj95QiHcVf91QyanWjjl1stmIWUqrSe6aCyNz18LB0PRx9wcc IfBlkWIaD48RoK9ZW2aB/Lpi8Ev6lp08IkSnVeQm24PkJueHT+U6oOj7cmjJelJFV9 xZWQ6riXVM0ear3y7XIiJ13G1kQf2e3TtixByIUz7p35BRb9Iew/W34IlwpHmTte6a qj9R8+1aCEUMj0PxjbnJYgnfh8ucPgQmzhE6YSBBmcoddrZ2/Q2h9ewcEq11gZ2/Lz NMiWJSCPA5x7duEluWs+9WeF7DWuOLWH6xF8TC3NwKlmaxym/h7AVt875Y1GYbQ9ve ELUJdgwVkSBVw== Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2019 09:47:25 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Michael Ellerman Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the powerpc tree Message-ID: <20190225094659.741bf42f@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <8736odl846.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> References: <20190224010511.74f25272@canb.auug.org.au> <8736odl846.fsf@concordia.ellerman.id.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; boundary="Sig_/==0L43=u6mND1Rkb1uxqnn9"; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , PowerPC , Linux Kernel Mailing List Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" --Sig_/==0L43=u6mND1Rkb1uxqnn9 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Michael, On Sun, 24 Feb 2019 22:48:57 +1100 Michael Ellerman wr= ote: > > But do they need SOBs? I think so, since they modify the code .. > The DCO says: >=20 > By making a contribution to this project, I certify that: >=20 > (a) The contribution was created in whole or in part by me and I > have the right to submit it under the open source license > indicated in the file; or >=20 > (b) The contribution is based upon previous work that, to the best > of my knowledge, is covered under an appropriate open source > license and I have the right under that license to submit that > work with modifications, whether created in whole or in part > by me, under the same open source license (unless I am > permitted to submit under a different license), as indicated > in the file; or >=20 > (c) The contribution was provided directly to me by some other > person who certified (a), (b) or (c) and I have not modified > it. >=20 > (d) I understand and agree that this project and the contribution > are public and that a record of the contribution (including a= ll > personal information I submit with it, including my sign-off)= is > maintained indefinitely and may be redistributed consistent w= ith > this project or the open source license(s) involved. >=20 >=20 > Only d) really applies to a revert, and as the maintainer I feel like d) > is kind of implied. I read this as (a || b || c) && d. And if there is no SOB, then none of the above is certified. > Anyway I'll try and remember to do it in future if that's The Rule ;) Its just as effective as the rest of our rules ... i.e. a strong suggestion :-) Thanks --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/==0L43=u6mND1Rkb1uxqnn9 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAlxzHv0ACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gz4KAf/YaVU9s53s+KgK+SNwYdSYd42mRJmfXVyrrUb0M6tubHkFyFsMmrI4apo lSaMmDwtrlOMf0Q8zm34TLUpyGtN0qGlhIlWgQJJSycLHZdh8BTkmzpyM5F9Byoa Yjiqx5eHBl1Bzd4K6BlJp0LdQG1FIuJcYKPD9iJ/mmqYhOLpEjs5KGiVmwQeML7g nzdG+lnBTlxdV/ja2VYqxtNK7Elb6PP6RpBSgqvWbPM1bIn95Ajk3HBJ93W9qvVK ykYz515cx8NvKj+OeKdnRX1uUDrjdU+vO06xFNL15/2ta5isXrdfbNiejglSChYh ZjfEz58DI2UdEoFIs8pqO7nCb9m3GA== =Vw1t -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/==0L43=u6mND1Rkb1uxqnn9--