All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
To: <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>,
	Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>,
	NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com>,
	Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de>,
	Fabio Estevam <fabio.estevam@nxp.com>,
	Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] ARM: imx6q: cpuidle: fix bug that CPU might not wake up at expected time
Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2019 11:34:13 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190226023413.19531-1-okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190222.174953.431124434951497467.okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>

 In the current cpuidle implementation for i.MX6q, the CPU that sets
'WAIT_UNCLOCKED' and the CPU that returns to 'WAIT_CLOCKED' are always
the same. While the CPU that sets 'WAIT_UNCLOCKED' is in IDLE state of
"WAIT", if the other CPU wakes up and enters IDLE state of "WFI"
istead of "WAIT", this CPU can not wake up at expired time.
 Because, in the case of "WFI", the CPU must be waked up by the local
timer interrupt. But, while 'WAIT_UNCLOCKED' is set, the local timer
is stopped, when all CPUs execute "wfi" instruction. As a result, the
local timer interrupt is not fired.
 In this situation, this CPU will wake up by IRQ different from local
timer. (e.g. broacast tiemr)

So, this fix changes CPU to return to 'WAIT_CLOCKED'.

Signed-off-by: Kohji Okuno <okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com>
---

Changes for v3:
 - remove the braces for a single statement inside the if block.

Changes for v2:
 - change "master" variable name.

 arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6q.c | 27 ++++++++++-----------------
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6q.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6q.c
index bfeb25aaf9a2..326e870d7123 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6q.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/cpuidle-imx6q.c
@@ -16,30 +16,23 @@
 #include "cpuidle.h"
 #include "hardware.h"
 
-static atomic_t master = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
-static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(master_lock);
+static int num_idle_cpus = 0;
+static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpuidle_lock);
 
 static int imx6q_enter_wait(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
 			    struct cpuidle_driver *drv, int index)
 {
-	if (atomic_inc_return(&master) == num_online_cpus()) {
-		/*
-		 * With this lock, we prevent other cpu to exit and enter
-		 * this function again and become the master.
-		 */
-		if (!spin_trylock(&master_lock))
-			goto idle;
+	spin_lock(&cpuidle_lock);
+	if (++num_idle_cpus == num_online_cpus())
 		imx6_set_lpm(WAIT_UNCLOCKED);
-		cpu_do_idle();
-		imx6_set_lpm(WAIT_CLOCKED);
-		spin_unlock(&master_lock);
-		goto done;
-	}
+	spin_unlock(&cpuidle_lock);
 
-idle:
 	cpu_do_idle();
-done:
-	atomic_dec(&master);
+
+	spin_lock(&cpuidle_lock);
+	if (num_idle_cpus-- == num_online_cpus())
+		imx6_set_lpm(WAIT_CLOCKED);
+	spin_unlock(&cpuidle_lock);
 
 	return index;
 }
-- 
2.17.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-02-26  2:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-02-22  8:49 [PATCH] ARM: imx6q: cpuidle: fix bug that CPU may not wake up Kohji Okuno
2019-02-22  9:14 ` Lucas Stach
2019-02-22 12:25   ` Fabio Estevam
2019-02-26  2:06 ` [PATCH v2] ARM: imx6q: cpuidle: fix bug that CPU might not wake up at expected time Kohji Okuno
2019-02-26  2:12   ` Fabio Estevam
2019-02-26  2:19     ` Kohji Okuno
2019-02-26  2:22       ` Fabio Estevam
2019-02-26  2:23       ` Kohji Okuno
2019-02-26  2:34 ` Kohji Okuno [this message]
2019-03-01  9:23   ` [PATCH v3] " Shawn Guo
2019-03-04  1:28     ` Kohji Okuno
2019-03-04  7:00       ` Shawn Guo
2019-03-04  7:06   ` Shawn Guo
2019-03-04  7:38     ` Kohji Okuno
2019-03-05 10:38     ` Kohji Okuno
2019-03-06  3:21       ` Shawn Guo
2019-03-06  4:30         ` [PATCH] ARM: imx6: cpuidle: omit the unnecessary unmask of GINT Kohji Okuno
2019-03-19 12:51           ` Shawn Guo
2019-03-20  0:07             ` Kohji Okuno
2019-03-20  1:12               ` Peng Fan
2019-03-20  3:08                 ` Aisheng Dong
2019-03-20  7:44                 ` Shawn Guo
2019-03-20  7:59                   ` Peng Fan
2019-03-20 14:28                     ` Shawn Guo
2019-03-20 14:35           ` Shawn Guo
2019-03-06 14:36       ` [PATCH v3] ARM: imx6q: cpuidle: fix bug that CPU might not wake up at expected time Peng Fan
2019-03-07  0:06         ` Kohji Okuno

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190226023413.19531-1-okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com \
    --to=okuno.kohji@jp.panasonic.com \
    --cc=fabio.estevam@nxp.com \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-imx@nxp.com \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.