From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 466DAC43381 for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 178BA218FD for ; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:12:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551366741; bh=eGEJ44wAVgpuhd9UmYjrlHvfG+utswhJaIZ2GcAwn3o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=Kckt2jZ7YmOjFjQmZa6qFYM7+WQmNhjAVHxE5tVFPOxMU7ldVj7+xaYOEENosQNhu Cny3Wz14PU7/y4XQYcTTD5mPLhWmHiy6sYWswtA/9sDf1rWZiPjGg44FaCuiayoSo+ 6dQxWO+OXV/qQdmYjcyUGx64tzbQa2LoCZ38+yQc= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2388226AbfB1PMT (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:12:19 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:45648 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2388204AbfB1PMP (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:12:15 -0500 Received: from sasha-vm.mshome.net (c-73-47-72-35.hsd1.nh.comcast.net [73.47.72.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 320C1218D9; Thu, 28 Feb 2019 15:12:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1551366735; bh=eGEJ44wAVgpuhd9UmYjrlHvfG+utswhJaIZ2GcAwn3o=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cGE0BFfVNU4VV68TAkFJur4BIwHdezL+QHSdeBVcdLQJxO10MlmnKgW3/hIfzuKLH tv0vwYH2EYMq3yM+/r6n+otbM3FuizLGrttNJB/ohzljCDpyYhm1mhtQU9eTrjL53/ aiecnJw4HOMpNCxu5/F4Y7gj/WdVON3pyVxQMKSU= From: Sasha Levin To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Martynas Pumputis , Daniel Borkmann , Sasha Levin , linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 35/64] bpf, selftests: fix handling of sparse CPU allocations Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:10:36 -0500 Message-Id: <20190228151105.11277-35-sashal@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.19.1 In-Reply-To: <20190228151105.11277-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190228151105.11277-1-sashal@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Patchwork-Hint: Ignore Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Martynas Pumputis [ Upstream commit 1bb54c4071f585ebef56ce8fdfe6026fa2cbcddd ] Previously, bpf_num_possible_cpus() had a bug when calculating a number of possible CPUs in the case of sparse CPU allocations, as it was considering only the first range or element of /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible. E.g. in the case of "0,2-3" (CPU 1 is not available), the function returned 1 instead of 3. This patch fixes the function by making it parse all CPU ranges and elements. Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis Acked-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h index 315a44fa32af3..84fd6f1bf33e7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void) unsigned int start, end, possible_cpus = 0; char buff[128]; FILE *fp; - int n; + int len, n, i, j = 0; fp = fopen(fcpu, "r"); if (!fp) { @@ -21,17 +21,27 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void) exit(1); } - while (fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) { - n = sscanf(buff, "%u-%u", &start, &end); - if (n == 0) { - printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n"); - exit(1); - } else if (n == 1) { - end = start; + if (!fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) { + printf("Failed to read %s!\n", fcpu); + exit(1); + } + + len = strlen(buff); + for (i = 0; i <= len; i++) { + if (buff[i] == ',' || buff[i] == '\0') { + buff[i] = '\0'; + n = sscanf(&buff[j], "%u-%u", &start, &end); + if (n <= 0) { + printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n"); + exit(1); + } else if (n == 1) { + end = start; + } + possible_cpus += end - start + 1; + j = i + 1; } - possible_cpus = start == 0 ? end + 1 : 0; - break; } + fclose(fp); return possible_cpus; -- 2.19.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sashal at kernel.org (Sasha Levin) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:10:36 -0500 Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 35/64] bpf, selftests: fix handling of sparse CPU allocations In-Reply-To: <20190228151105.11277-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190228151105.11277-1-sashal@kernel.org> Message-ID: <20190228151105.11277-35-sashal@kernel.org> From: Martynas Pumputis [ Upstream commit 1bb54c4071f585ebef56ce8fdfe6026fa2cbcddd ] Previously, bpf_num_possible_cpus() had a bug when calculating a number of possible CPUs in the case of sparse CPU allocations, as it was considering only the first range or element of /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible. E.g. in the case of "0,2-3" (CPU 1 is not available), the function returned 1 instead of 3. This patch fixes the function by making it parse all CPU ranges and elements. Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis Acked-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h index 315a44fa32af3..84fd6f1bf33e7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void) unsigned int start, end, possible_cpus = 0; char buff[128]; FILE *fp; - int n; + int len, n, i, j = 0; fp = fopen(fcpu, "r"); if (!fp) { @@ -21,17 +21,27 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void) exit(1); } - while (fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) { - n = sscanf(buff, "%u-%u", &start, &end); - if (n == 0) { - printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n"); - exit(1); - } else if (n == 1) { - end = start; + if (!fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) { + printf("Failed to read %s!\n", fcpu); + exit(1); + } + + len = strlen(buff); + for (i = 0; i <= len; i++) { + if (buff[i] == ',' || buff[i] == '\0') { + buff[i] = '\0'; + n = sscanf(&buff[j], "%u-%u", &start, &end); + if (n <= 0) { + printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n"); + exit(1); + } else if (n == 1) { + end = start; + } + possible_cpus += end - start + 1; + j = i + 1; } - possible_cpus = start == 0 ? end + 1 : 0; - break; } + fclose(fp); return possible_cpus; -- 2.19.1 From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sashal@kernel.org (Sasha Levin) Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:10:36 -0500 Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 35/64] bpf, selftests: fix handling of sparse CPU allocations In-Reply-To: <20190228151105.11277-1-sashal@kernel.org> References: <20190228151105.11277-1-sashal@kernel.org> Message-ID: <20190228151105.11277-35-sashal@kernel.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Message-ID: <20190228151036.-WEGgt_RJXQ39le7QbsiTwde4Xufu6cmVVzj-fNc-6M@z> From: Martynas Pumputis [ Upstream commit 1bb54c4071f585ebef56ce8fdfe6026fa2cbcddd ] Previously, bpf_num_possible_cpus() had a bug when calculating a number of possible CPUs in the case of sparse CPU allocations, as it was considering only the first range or element of /sys/devices/system/cpu/possible. E.g. in the case of "0,2-3" (CPU 1 is not available), the function returned 1 instead of 3. This patch fixes the function by making it parse all CPU ranges and elements. Signed-off-by: Martynas Pumputis Acked-by: Yonghong Song Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h | 30 +++++++++++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h index 315a44fa32af3..84fd6f1bf33e7 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/bpf_util.h @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void) unsigned int start, end, possible_cpus = 0; char buff[128]; FILE *fp; - int n; + int len, n, i, j = 0; fp = fopen(fcpu, "r"); if (!fp) { @@ -21,17 +21,27 @@ static inline unsigned int bpf_num_possible_cpus(void) exit(1); } - while (fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) { - n = sscanf(buff, "%u-%u", &start, &end); - if (n == 0) { - printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n"); - exit(1); - } else if (n == 1) { - end = start; + if (!fgets(buff, sizeof(buff), fp)) { + printf("Failed to read %s!\n", fcpu); + exit(1); + } + + len = strlen(buff); + for (i = 0; i <= len; i++) { + if (buff[i] == ',' || buff[i] == '\0') { + buff[i] = '\0'; + n = sscanf(&buff[j], "%u-%u", &start, &end); + if (n <= 0) { + printf("Failed to retrieve # possible CPUs!\n"); + exit(1); + } else if (n == 1) { + end = start; + } + possible_cpus += end - start + 1; + j = i + 1; } - possible_cpus = start == 0 ? end + 1 : 0; - break; } + fclose(fp); return possible_cpus; -- 2.19.1