From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: speck@linutronix.de
Subject: [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] performance walnuts
Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2019 19:08:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190306180814.GB19757@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2a4e673272400fba1a2d5d6320f701e4727c7067.camel@infradead.org>
On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 01:02:30PM +0000, speck for David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 12:56 +0100, speck for Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 06, 2019 at 10:23:52AM +0100, speck for Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > > On Tue, 5 Mar 2019, speck for Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > >
> > > > Or whatever shiney new name they ought to get.
> > > >
> > > > Apparently the intent is to have these patches magically appears in source
> > > > repos on the 12th.
> > >
> > > I made them magically appear in the speck repo:
> > >
> > > cvs.ou.linutronix.de:linux/speck/linux tsx-5.0
> > >
> > > and backports in the branches tsx-4.20, tsx-4.19, tsx-4.14. Git bundles
> > > are attached.
> > >
> > > I leave the dead kernel backports to the honorable members of the Kernel
> > > Necrophilia cult as usual.
> >
> > Many thanks for doing these backports. I'll use them for the stable
> > updates next week. As for kernels older than 4.14, I'll maybe try
> > 4.9 on my own...
>
> Let me know if you want me to take a look. I'm travelling next week so
> would have to try to squeeze it in this week.
Do you all really care about 4.9.y anymore? I thought you all had moved
off of it to 4.14.y already. I'll look at it tomorrow and see how bad
it looks...
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-06 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-05 21:23 [MODERATED] [PATCH v2 0/4] performance walnuts Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-05 21:23 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH v2 1/4] perf/x86/intel: Make cpuc allocations consistent Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-05 21:23 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH v2 2/4] perf/x86/intel: Generalize dynamic constraint creation Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-05 21:23 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH v2 3/4] x86: Add TSX Force Abort CPUID/MSR Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-05 21:23 ` [MODERATED] [PATCH v2 4/4] perf/x86/intel: Implement support for TSX Force Abort Peter Zijlstra
2019-03-05 22:19 ` [MODERATED] Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] performance walnuts Linus Torvalds
2019-03-05 22:26 ` Jiri Kosina
2019-03-05 22:33 ` Nelson D'Souza
2019-03-06 9:23 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-06 11:56 ` [MODERATED] " Greg KH
2019-03-06 13:02 ` David Woodhouse
2019-03-06 18:08 ` Greg KH [this message]
2019-03-06 18:32 ` Mark Hatle
2019-03-07 14:12 ` Greg KH
2019-03-07 17:42 ` Mark Hatle
2019-03-07 20:07 ` Thomas Gleixner
2019-03-07 14:13 ` [MODERATED] " Greg KH
2019-03-07 21:42 ` mark gross
2019-03-07 22:06 ` Greg KH
2019-03-08 9:15 ` Jiri Kosina
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190306180814.GB19757@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=speck@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.