From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:49209) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1uCR-00061o-MH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 09:40:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1uCQ-0001uN-GT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 09:40:43 -0500 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:46604) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h1uCQ-0001fQ-4N for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 07 Mar 2019 09:40:42 -0500 Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 09:40:17 -0500 From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk Message-ID: <20190307144017.GI1598@char.us.oracle.com> References: <20190307072253.9868-1-elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com> <8b794ba1-f719-e1f4-5a17-ba261aeebea6@redhat.com> <20190307141642.GE5786@linux.fritz.box> <106e1413-85e4-2ed9-0ffa-9c0f9fe73cf9@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <106e1413-85e4-2ed9-0ffa-9c0f9fe73cf9@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [multiprocess RFC PATCH 36/37] multi-process: add the concept description to docs/devel/qemu-multiprocess List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: Kevin Wolf , elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com, john.g.johnson@oracle.com, sstabellini@kernel.org, jag.raman@oracle.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, ross.lagerwall@citrix.com, liran.alon@oracle.com, stefanha@redhat.com, kanth.ghatraju@oracle.com On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 03:21:47PM +0100, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 07/03/2019 15.16, Kevin Wolf wrote: > > Am 07.03.2019 um 09:14 hat Thomas Huth geschrieben: > >> On 07/03/2019 08.22, elena.ufimtseva@oracle.com wrote: > >>> From: Elena Ufimtseva > >>> > >>> TODO: Make relevant changes to the doc. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: John G Johnson > >>> Signed-off-by: Elena Ufimtseva > >>> Signed-off-by: Jagannathan Raman > >>> --- > >>> docs/devel/qemu-multiprocess.txt | 1109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >>> 1 file changed, 1109 insertions(+) > >>> create mode 100644 docs/devel/qemu-multiprocess.txt > >>> > >>> diff --git a/docs/devel/qemu-multiprocess.txt b/docs/devel/qemu-multiprocess.txt > >>> new file mode 100644 > >>> index 0000000..e29c6c8 > >>> --- /dev/null > >>> +++ b/docs/devel/qemu-multiprocess.txt > >>> @@ -0,0 +1,1109 @@ > >>> +/* > >>> + * Copyright 2019, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. > >>> + * > >>> + * Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy > >>> + * of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal > >>> + * in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights > >>> + * to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell > >>> + * copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is > >>> + * furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: > >>> + * > >>> + * The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in > >>> + * all copies or substantial portions of the Software. > >>> + * > >>> + * THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR > >>> + * IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, > >>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL > >>> + * THE AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER > >>> + * LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, > >>> + * OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN > >>> + * THE SOFTWARE. > >>> + */ > >> > >> Somehow weird to see such a big license statement talking about > >> "software", but which applies to a text file only... Not sure if it is > >> an option for you, but maybe one of the Creative Common licenses > >> (dual-licensed with the GPLv2+) would be a better fit? E.g. for the QEMU > >> website, the content is dual-licensed: https://www.qemu.org/license.html > > > > While we're talking about licenses, the "All rights reserved." notice is > > out of place in a license header that declares that a lot of permissions > > are granted. Better to remove it to avoid any ambiguities that could > > result from the contradiction. (Applies to the whole series.) > > Apart from that, it is also not required for other work anymore. See: > > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/All_rights_reserved Interesting. Do folks know why the Linux Foundation does it? See for example cf0d37aecc06801d4847fb36740da4a5690d9d45 (in the Linux kernel) where every change they stamp it with their 'All Rights Reserved'? > > Thomas