All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
	Linux BTRFS Mailinglist <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: reduce kmap_atomic time for checksumming
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 18:42:40 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190307174239.GN31119@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190307161400.25065-1-jthumshirn@suse.de>

On Thu, Mar 07, 2019 at 05:14:00PM +0100, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Since commit c40a3d38aff4 ("Btrfs: Compute and look up csums based on
> sectorsized blocks") we do a kmap_atomic() on the contents of a bvec.
> 
> kmap_atomic() in turn does a preempt_disable() and pagefault_disable(),
> so we shouldn't map the data for too long. Reduce the time the bvec's
> page is mapped to when we actually need it.
> 
> Performance wise it doesn't seem to make a huge difference with a 2 vcpu VM
> on a /dev/zram device:
> 
>        vanilla      patched      delta
> write  17.4MiB/s    17.8MiB/s	+0.4MiB/s (+2%)
> read   40.6MiB/s    41.5MiB/s   +0.9MiB/s (+2%)
> 
> The following fio job profile was used in the comparision:
> 
> [global]
> ioengine=libaio
> direct=1
> sync=1
> norandommap
> time_based
> runtime=10m
> size=100m
> group_reporting
> numjobs=2
> 
> [test]
> filename=/mnt/test/fio
> rw=randrw
> rwmixread=70
> 
> Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
> ---
>  fs/btrfs/file-item.c | 8 ++------
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> index 920bf3b4b0ef..aa40e66df1e1 100644
> --- a/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> +++ b/fs/btrfs/file-item.c
> @@ -453,8 +453,6 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
>  			BUG_ON(!ordered); /* Logic error */
>  		}
>  
> -		data = kmap_atomic(bvec.bv_page);
> -
>  		nr_sectors = BTRFS_BYTES_TO_BLKS(fs_info,
>  						 bvec.bv_len + fs_info->sectorsize
>  						 - 1);
> @@ -464,7 +462,6 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
>  				offset < ordered->file_offset) {
>  				unsigned long bytes_left;
>  
> -				kunmap_atomic(data);
>  				sums->len = this_sum_bytes;
>  				this_sum_bytes = 0;
>  				btrfs_add_ordered_sum(inode, ordered, sums);
> @@ -482,16 +479,16 @@ blk_status_t btrfs_csum_one_bio(struct inode *inode, struct bio *bio,
>  				sums->bytenr = ((u64)bio->bi_iter.bi_sector << 9)
>  					+ total_bytes;
>  				index = 0;
> -
> -				data = kmap_atomic(bvec.bv_page);
>  			}
>  
>  			sums->sums[index] = ~(u32)0;
> +			data = kmap_atomic(bvec.bv_page);
>  			sums->sums[index]
>  				= btrfs_csum_data(data + bvec.bv_offset
>  						+ (i * fs_info->sectorsize),
>  						sums->sums[index],
>  						fs_info->sectorsize);
> +			kunmap_atomic(data);

The code before c40a3d38aff4 did exactly this, ie. kmap only around the
checksumming. I don't actually see anywhere from the context why it
would need to be around the whole bvec as none of the operations uses
that.

So I think your patch is correct.

Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

      reply	other threads:[~2019-03-07 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-07 16:14 [PATCH] btrfs: reduce kmap_atomic time for checksumming Johannes Thumshirn
2019-03-07 17:42 ` David Sterba [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190307174239.GN31119@twin.jikos.cz \
    --to=dsterba@suse.cz \
    --cc=dsterba@suse.com \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.