From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on archive.lwn.net X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=5.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by archive.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id DB7297D04D for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:30:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727469AbfCKRaR (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:30:17 -0400 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:56442 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727019AbfCKRaR (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Mar 2019 13:30:17 -0400 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CEA627DF; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 17:30:16 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 11:30:15 -0600 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Jani Nikula Cc: Markus Heiser , "Tobin C. Harding" , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: undefined label Message-ID: <20190311113015.166262c9@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: <878sxp7e6s.fsf@intel.com> References: <20190307091734.GB9152@eros.localdomain> <20190307203041.GC21937@eros.localdomain> <878sxp7e6s.fsf@intel.com> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-doc-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 08 Mar 2019 14:17:47 +0200 Jani Nikula wrote: > > >> To close such cross-books links we can use intersphinx [1] and map to e.g. > > >> > > >> intersphinx_mapping = { > > >> 'kernel': ('https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/', None)} > > > > This requires online access while building the output. Anyway, as soon as > > I have some time to spare I will send a RFC with more explanation about > > (you will receive it in CC). > > Please remember to call out the online access in the patch series. Such > a requirement is going to draw a lot of opposition. Indeed, I think that would a difficult requirement to add. It may well be better, in the end, to simply document this "feature" and live with it. jon