All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Locke <kevin@kevinlocke.name>
To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: linuxwifi@intel.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, "Coelho,
	Luciano" <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [linuxwifi] [RFC] iwlwifi: enable TX AMPDU for some iwldvm
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 09:06:34 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190313150634.GA10043@kevinolos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cdd094bd29f1e20dc5577fcbad6a7b404e66407a.camel@intel.com>

On Wed, 2019-03-13 at 04:58 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> Just to align on expectations, I don't feel like enable A-MPDU by
> default regardless of what will come out of this. People stopped
> complaining after we disabled A-MPDU and the very very very few people
> that did need more throughput knew how to enable them with the module
> parameter. So, I don't plan to re-enable A-MPDU by default.

I understand.  I disagree that very few people would benefit from
nearly doubling TCP throughput or that the fix is known/obvious.
However, if it's not worth the risk and/or effort, or there is no
reliable way to determine which devices/configurations are unaffected,
so be it.  Resources are limited and that's totally understandable.

Let me know if there is anything else I can do to assist.

Thanks,
Kevin

      reply	other threads:[~2019-03-13 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-03-12 17:12 [RFC] iwlwifi: enable TX AMPDU for some iwldvm Kevin Locke
2019-03-12 19:38 ` [linuxwifi] " Luciano Coelho
2019-03-12 19:47   ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2019-03-12 20:31     ` Kevin Locke
2019-03-12 20:48       ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2019-03-12 21:44         ` Kevin Locke
2019-03-13  4:58           ` Grumbach, Emmanuel
2019-03-13 15:06             ` Kevin Locke [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190313150634.GA10043@kevinolos \
    --to=kevin@kevinlocke.name \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxwifi@intel.com \
    --cc=luciano.coelho@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.