From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_MED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F533C10F00 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 19:19:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E35C82133D for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 19:19:08 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.i=@netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com header.b="mNJm3d0e" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727706AbfCRTTH (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:19:07 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f171.google.com ([209.85.222.171]:40980 "EHLO mail-qk1-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727425AbfCRTTH (ORCPT ); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 15:19:07 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f171.google.com with SMTP id o129so10360356qke.8 for ; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:19:06 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=netronome-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to:references :organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8o6Wcsa/CrBq/NkESl5MhFKn7vUDv6XnBRAZUXC0VoI=; b=mNJm3d0eL0d1T2mGcTRCvkbeSB8ILSN2sd5RN7uiFk7A1M7OVObUb9pTi89O7avPP4 PlF6lEI4+iNKADwT6nWeLK55Q+l+a4Ln9sQfrRvABxXxxYliEGW//2XYySG5iBqln6aq PKCHA4Pn78WRj4KXHezWVICw/hYFayFYZ+z/0xR79bSFr4c/As7yyyA28WCNGpLFe1/V m74BdaG2hZp6VeGst2lU0GbCDr5FPgjeMV7QKLTmabA1kOsdsZpXHWXGWi101VIDryud 3BGc52poS0sgS/x6bZOKH7Qz1SrJahggftvKiVS+oA1hjM5JwhQk/KmSlMGsPQul5W0x VfUA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:in-reply-to :references:organization:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=8o6Wcsa/CrBq/NkESl5MhFKn7vUDv6XnBRAZUXC0VoI=; b=Y0OECz2jxjWZ7hpZuni0hNdVev73mRLB3MHK7l9/e4ySrfyNyHJvaFMX64JPNOJK99 tpUQa1ZiJl7GIsaDfn0AOvZVq7yezn4EQ4jFYrF9nSpbzATPrB/aeCpY8SiS7Es9DYUr 4EBv4SvabBhCYPAKtPq1Pm0dtSWswFpVGAwq/0M7+KGpHvA7iaThys/wwUPOs1VOPIiC e5noYiq1J0bQZmHUmZwuGogxpGs2qVENoy2IHCBCeKwgEDoO3nZKWFqxfBW3AOMkeKlP TzfugfcNidDdeOIkyVucG/kMkcBg+Y+m2HNneBpC3FirPurHJ+D6RikpJQ+CZGCMjo9r 8XlQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX5vfL1a0b3mNwORUd4XGAyqZNrCDK28BUME3ovTWs30NMHl5Rm Lykx8BZVByq+A/ahqbUhBfvJLA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxxxbKuTSS0KeBD9C+eTwpf5f/NwzTEyGxz8V4fbwGQQPK0ObYtyogeuXnzqg9iwM4JwEjQ8A== X-Received: by 2002:ae9:f509:: with SMTP id o9mr14056458qkg.133.1552936746058; Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:19:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from cakuba.netronome.com ([66.60.152.14]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p46sm3793318qtc.41.2019.03.18.12.19.05 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:19:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:19:00 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Jiri Pirko Cc: Parav Pandit , "Samudrala, Sridhar" , "davem@davemloft.net" , "netdev@vger.kernel.org" , "oss-drivers@netronome.com" Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] devlink: allow subports on devlink PCI ports Message-ID: <20190318121900.4412fabb@cakuba.netronome.com> In-Reply-To: <20190318122105.GH2270@nanopsycho> References: <20190314150945.031d1b08@cakuba.netronome.com> <20190314163915.24fd2481@cakuba.netronome.com> <4436da3d-4b99-f792-8e77-695d5958794d@intel.com> <20190315200814.GD2305@nanopsycho> <20190318122105.GH2270@nanopsycho> Organization: Netronome Systems, Ltd. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: netdev@vger.kernel.org On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 13:21:05 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote: > >First two entries shows the link between hostport and switchport. > >$ devlink port show > >pci/0000:05:00.0/10002 eth netdev flavour switchport switch_id 00154d130d2f peer pci/0000:05:00.0/1 > > > >pci/0000:05:00.0/1 eth netdev flavour hostport switch_id 00154d130d2f peer pci/0000:05:00.0/10002 > > Hostport should not have switch_id. Isn't a concept of a port of a switch without a switch ID a red flag?