From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
To: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>,
"Samudrala, Sridhar" <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>,
"davem@davemloft.net" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"oss-drivers@netronome.com" <oss-drivers@netronome.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] devlink: allow subports on devlink PCI ports
Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2019 12:59:35 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190318125935.580c8fbe@cakuba.netronome.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR0501MB2271EFA6506D1A47C7EC8DFFD1470@VI1PR0501MB2271.eurprd05.prod.outlook.com>
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 19:44:21 +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
> > Sent: Monday, March 18, 2019 2:37 PM
> > To: Parav Pandit <parav@mellanox.com>
> > Cc: Jiri Pirko <jiri@resnulli.us>; Samudrala, Sridhar
> > <sridhar.samudrala@intel.com>; davem@davemloft.net;
> > netdev@vger.kernel.org; oss-drivers@netronome.com
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] devlink: allow subports on devlink PCI
> > ports
> >
> > On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 16:22:33 +0000, Parav Pandit wrote:
> > >>>>>>2. flavour should not be vf/pf, flavour should be hostport, switchport.
> > >>> >Because switch is flat and agnostic of pf/vf/mdev.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Not sure. It's good to have this kind of visibility.
> > >>>>>
> > >>>> port can have label/attribute indicating that this belong to VF-1
> > >>>> or mdev as long as you are agreeing to have mdev attribute on host port.
> > >>>> (and not ask for abstracting it, because mdev is well defined kernel object).
> > >>>
> > >>> Why mdev cannot be another flavour?
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >> hostport is of type pf/vf/mdev connected to some switchport.
> > >>
> > >> So proposal is to have,
> > >> port flavour = hostport/switchport
> > >> port type/label = pf/vf/mdev
> > >>
> > > Instead of having two attributes per port, how about having, port
> > > flavour= physical/cpu/dsa/pf/vf/mdev/switchport.
> > >
> > > physical and pf has some overlapping definitions.
> >
> > What "overlapping definitions" do physical and PF have?
> PF has physically user facing port.
PF doesn't "have a user facing port" in switchdev mode. It's a
limitation of Mellanox HW that you have some strong association
there.
> And physical port in include/uapi/linux/devlink.h also describe that.
By "that" you must mean that the physical is a user facing port.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-18 19:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 100+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-01 18:04 [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] devlink: expose PF and VF representors as ports Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01 18:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/7] nfp: split devlink port init from registration Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01 18:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/7] devlink: add PF and VF port flavours Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01 18:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 3/7] nfp: register devlink ports of all reprs Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-02 8:43 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-02 19:07 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-04 7:36 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-04 23:32 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01 18:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 4/7] devlink: allow subports on devlink PCI ports Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-02 9:41 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-02 19:48 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-04 7:56 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-05 0:33 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-05 11:06 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-05 17:15 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-05 19:59 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-06 12:20 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-06 17:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-07 3:56 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-07 9:48 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-08 2:52 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-08 14:54 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-08 19:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-11 8:52 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-12 2:10 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-12 14:02 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-12 20:56 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-13 6:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-13 16:17 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-13 16:22 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-13 16:55 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-14 7:38 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-14 22:09 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-14 22:35 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-14 23:39 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-15 1:28 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-15 1:31 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-15 2:15 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2019-03-15 2:40 ` Parav Pandit
[not found] ` <ae938b4f-5fa9-3c33-8ae6-eab2d3d9f1ec@intel.com>
2019-03-15 15:32 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-15 20:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-15 20:44 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-15 22:12 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-16 1:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-18 15:43 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-18 19:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-18 12:11 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-18 19:16 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-21 8:45 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-21 15:14 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-21 16:14 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-21 16:52 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-21 17:20 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-21 17:34 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-22 16:27 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-23 0:37 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-15 21:59 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-18 12:21 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-18 15:56 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-18 16:22 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-18 19:36 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-18 19:44 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-18 19:59 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2019-03-18 20:35 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-18 21:29 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-18 22:11 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-20 18:24 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-20 20:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-20 23:39 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-21 9:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-21 15:03 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-21 16:16 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-21 16:50 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-21 17:23 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-21 17:42 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-22 13:32 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-23 0:40 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-25 20:34 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-18 19:19 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-18 19:38 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-21 9:09 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-15 7:00 ` Jiri Pirko
[not found] ` <7227d58e-ac58-d549-b921-ca0a0dd3f4b0@intel.com>
2019-03-13 7:37 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-13 16:03 ` Samudrala, Sridhar
2019-03-13 16:24 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-04 11:19 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-05 0:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-05 11:07 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-04 11:08 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-05 0:51 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-05 11:09 ` Jiri Pirko
2019-03-01 18:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 5/7] nfp: switch to devlink_port_get_phys_port_name() Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01 18:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 6/7] devlink: introduce port's peer netdevs Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-01 18:04 ` [PATCH net-next v2 7/7] nfp: expose PF " Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-02 10:13 ` [PATCH net-next v2 0/7] devlink: expose PF and VF representors as ports Jiri Pirko
2019-03-02 19:49 ` [oss-drivers] " Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-04 5:12 ` Parav Pandit
2019-03-04 18:22 ` David Miller
2019-03-20 20:25 ` Jakub Kicinski
2019-03-21 9:11 ` Jiri Pirko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190318125935.580c8fbe@cakuba.netronome.com \
--to=jakub.kicinski@netronome.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oss-drivers@netronome.com \
--cc=parav@mellanox.com \
--cc=sridhar.samudrala@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.