From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.4 required=3.0 tests=DATE_IN_PAST_06_12, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_MUTT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09D65C43381 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:31:12 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA7E3218D3 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:31:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729092AbfCVObB (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:31:01 -0400 Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com ([148.163.158.5]:36640 "EHLO mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728639AbfCVObB (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:31:01 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (m0098421.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x2MEL6QP011607 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:30:59 -0400 Received: from e11.ny.us.ibm.com (e11.ny.us.ibm.com [129.33.205.201]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2rd0saj7vf-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 10:30:57 -0400 Received: from localhost by e11.ny.us.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:30:58 -0000 Received: from b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (9.57.198.25) by e11.ny.us.ibm.com (146.89.104.198) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:30:53 -0000 Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.108]) by b01cxnp22035.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id x2MEUp1h24182934 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:30:51 GMT Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBE55B2066; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:30:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D548B205F; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:30:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: from paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (unknown [9.70.82.188]) by b01ledav003.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 14:30:51 +0000 (GMT) Received: by paulmck-ThinkPad-W541 (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A3EE516C2A63; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:35:53 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:35:53 -0700 From: "Paul E. McKenney" To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Josh Triplett , Steven Rostedt , Mathieu Desnoyers , Lai Jiangshan , Joel Fernandes , tglx@linutronix.de, Mike Galbraith Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] rcu: Allow to eliminate softirq processing from rcutree Reply-To: paulmck@linux.ibm.com References: <20190320160547.s5lbeahr2y4jlzwt@linutronix.de> <20190320161500.GK4102@linux.ibm.com> <20190320163532.mr32oi53iaueuizw@linutronix.de> <20190320173001.GM4102@linux.ibm.com> <20190320175952.yh6yfy64vaiurszw@linutronix.de> <20190320181210.GO4102@linux.ibm.com> <20190320181435.x3qyutwqllmq5zbk@linutronix.de> <20190320211333.eq7pwxnte7la67ph@linutronix.de> <20190320234601.GQ4102@linux.ibm.com> <20190321233244.GA11476@linux.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190321233244.GA11476@linux.ibm.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 19032214-2213-0000-0000-00000368A767 X-IBM-SpamModules-Scores: X-IBM-SpamModules-Versions: BY=3.00010794; HX=3.00000242; KW=3.00000007; PH=3.00000004; SC=3.00000282; SDB=6.01178056; UDB=6.00616317; IPR=6.00958755; MB=3.00026111; MTD=3.00000008; XFM=3.00000015; UTC=2019-03-22 14:30:56 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 19032214-2214-0000-0000-00005DC2899E Message-Id: <20190322073553.GA22086@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:,, definitions=2019-03-22_08:,, signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903220106 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 21, 2019 at 04:32:44PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 04:46:01PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 10:13:33PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > > > Running RCU out of softirq is a problem for some workloads that would > > > like to manage RCU core processing independently of other softirq > > > work, for example, setting kthread priority. This commit therefore > > > introduces the `rcunosoftirq' option which moves the RCU core work > > > from softirq to a per-CPU/per-flavor SCHED_OTHER kthread named rcuc. > > > The SCHED_OTHER approach avoids the scalability problems that appeared > > > with the earlier attempt to move RCU core processing to from softirq > > > to kthreads. That said, kernels built with RCU_BOOST=y will run the > > > rcuc kthreads at the RCU-boosting priority. > > > > > > Reported-by: Thomas Gleixner > > > Tested-by: Mike Galbraith > > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > > > > Thank you! I reverted v2 and applied this one with the same sort of > > update. Testing is going well thus far aside from my failing to add > > the required "=0" after the rcutree.use_softirq. I will probably not > > be the only one who will run afoul of this, so I updated the commit log > > and the documentation accordingly, as shown below. > > And I took a look, please see updates/questions interspersed. > > I didn't find anything substantive, but still I get hangs. Which is > the normal situation. ;-) > > Will fire off more testing... And despite my protestations about restrictions involving the scheduler and rcu_read_unlock(), with the patch below TREE01, TREE02, TREE03, and TREE09 pass an hour of rcutorture with rcutree.use_softirq=0. Without this patch, seven-minute runs get hard hangs and this: [ 18.417315] BUG: spinlock recursion on CPU#5, rcu_torture_rea/763 [ 18.418624] lock: 0xffff9d207eb61940, .magic: dead4ead, .owner: rcu_torture_rea/763, .owner_cpu: 5 [ 18.420418] CPU: 5 PID: 763 Comm: rcu_torture_rea Not tainted 5.1.0-rc1+ #1 [ 18.421786] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS Bochs 01/01/2011 [ 18.423375] Call Trace: [ 18.423880] [ 18.424284] dump_stack+0x46/0x5b [ 18.424953] do_raw_spin_lock+0x8d/0x90 [ 18.425699] try_to_wake_up+0x2cd/0x4f0 [ 18.426493] invoke_rcu_core_kthread+0x63/0x80 [ 18.427337] rcu_read_unlock_special+0x41/0x80 [ 18.428212] __rcu_read_unlock+0x48/0x50 [ 18.428984] cpuacct_charge+0x96/0xd0 [ 18.429725] ? cpuacct_charge+0x2e/0xd0 [ 18.430463] update_curr+0x112/0x240 [ 18.431172] enqueue_task_fair+0xa9/0x1220 [ 18.432009] ttwu_do_activate+0x49/0xa0 [ 18.432741] sched_ttwu_pending+0x75/0xa0 [ 18.433583] scheduler_ipi+0x53/0x150 [ 18.434291] reschedule_interrupt+0xf/0x20 [ 18.435137] rcu_read_unlock_special. Again, the patch below is bad for expedited grace periods, so it is experimental. Thanx, Paul ------------------------------------------------------------------------ diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h index ca972b0b2467..d133fa837426 100644 --- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h @@ -607,12 +607,9 @@ static void rcu_read_unlock_special(struct task_struct *t) if (preempt_bh_were_disabled || irqs_were_disabled) { WRITE_ONCE(t->rcu_read_unlock_special.b.exp_hint, false); /* Need to defer quiescent state until everything is enabled. */ - if (irqs_were_disabled) { + if (irqs_were_disabled && use_softirq) { /* Enabling irqs does not reschedule, so... */ - if (use_softirq) - raise_softirq_irqoff(RCU_SOFTIRQ); - else - invoke_rcu_core(); + raise_softirq_irqoff(RCU_SOFTIRQ); } else { /* Enabling BH or preempt does reschedule, so... */ set_tsk_need_resched(current);