From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A6D2C43381 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:34:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0B59F21934 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:34:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553254479; bh=Ohw06WhEaAl7XqqGNpfuxEsao6piMaLebrJFIHPHMNY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=dpmK7czfyF+lDYNXzsm83Vk6k6cfp0hMsVIr0e2vW3gRluAv0WK1jkNtpg2w6I4bN MuoePKsgUu1Ve8F2cQmK9kHMOuxz0Q7ZgiW4vq9smi22enCzT5W/WhANnu9JWBhDHA tA8EkYAg0VPcBufamk3RvS2OTybZpHLcJ3XQypPE= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730448AbfCVLei (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:34:38 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:35258 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730037AbfCVLef (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Mar 2019 07:34:35 -0400 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4DCEF21917; Fri, 22 Mar 2019 11:34:34 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1553254474; bh=Ohw06WhEaAl7XqqGNpfuxEsao6piMaLebrJFIHPHMNY=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=cTVvWg83mxWtW3c+VMjXG5oMEHGOR1Z0cZ+YHhjdkvo0F93SbeTBw1Yyh4rfielph Jx7eQII7Fjm3dnw1nrIkEkKZT82Eq3YHsyMUgw0m2UxrEFuUmEpi2RJKy15kJIkPUj ZeTgGqQMXH8nOzLnhk0nC+eFhf83vbQ/tJaEJCRw= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Sasha Levin , Al Viro , Emil Karlson Subject: [PATCH 4.4 147/230] fs/9p: use fscache mutex rather than spinlock Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2019 12:14:45 +0100 Message-Id: <20190322111246.959130531@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190322111236.796964179@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20190322111236.796964179@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Sasha Levin commit 8f5fed1e917588f946ad8882bd47a4093db0ff4c upstream. We may sleep inside a the lock, so use a mutex rather than spinlock. Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Al Viro Cc: Emil Karlson Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- fs/9p/cache.c | 8 ++++---- fs/9p/v9fs.h | 2 +- fs/9p/vfs_inode.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) --- a/fs/9p/cache.c +++ b/fs/9p/cache.c @@ -243,14 +243,14 @@ void v9fs_cache_inode_set_cookie(struct if (!v9inode->fscache) return; - spin_lock(&v9inode->fscache_lock); + mutex_lock(&v9inode->fscache_lock); if ((filp->f_flags & O_ACCMODE) != O_RDONLY) v9fs_cache_inode_flush_cookie(inode); else v9fs_cache_inode_get_cookie(inode); - spin_unlock(&v9inode->fscache_lock); + mutex_unlock(&v9inode->fscache_lock); } void v9fs_cache_inode_reset_cookie(struct inode *inode) @@ -264,7 +264,7 @@ void v9fs_cache_inode_reset_cookie(struc old = v9inode->fscache; - spin_lock(&v9inode->fscache_lock); + mutex_lock(&v9inode->fscache_lock); fscache_relinquish_cookie(v9inode->fscache, 1); v9ses = v9fs_inode2v9ses(inode); @@ -274,7 +274,7 @@ void v9fs_cache_inode_reset_cookie(struc p9_debug(P9_DEBUG_FSC, "inode %p revalidating cookie old %p new %p\n", inode, old, v9inode->fscache); - spin_unlock(&v9inode->fscache_lock); + mutex_unlock(&v9inode->fscache_lock); } int __v9fs_fscache_release_page(struct page *page, gfp_t gfp) --- a/fs/9p/v9fs.h +++ b/fs/9p/v9fs.h @@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ struct v9fs_session_info { struct v9fs_inode { #ifdef CONFIG_9P_FSCACHE - spinlock_t fscache_lock; + struct mutex fscache_lock; struct fscache_cookie *fscache; #endif struct p9_qid qid; --- a/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c +++ b/fs/9p/vfs_inode.c @@ -244,7 +244,7 @@ struct inode *v9fs_alloc_inode(struct su return NULL; #ifdef CONFIG_9P_FSCACHE v9inode->fscache = NULL; - spin_lock_init(&v9inode->fscache_lock); + mutex_init(&v9inode->fscache_lock); #endif v9inode->writeback_fid = NULL; v9inode->cache_validity = 0;